JSH: Some history is the future
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 343.4: Gravitomagnetism, GravitoWeak Interaction, GravitoStrong Interaction, and Repulsive Combinations
Next: Quantum Gravity 343.5: Multiple Interaction Literature (Continued)
From: JSH on 14 Nov 2009 23:38 One of the weirder things that has emerged from my mathematical research is the possibility of continual transmission of information from the future to the past in order to CREATE the future, where key is what I call the optimal path algorithm. Used against the Traveling Salesman Problem it gives you a traveler going backwards in time to meet himself, where the algorithm requires continual communication between the two travelers in order to get the optimal path. If that is a routine part of nature then light takes the optimal path in that way, and it also gives an arrow to time--we think we're traveling forward in the future as we're the collapsed path, when actually we're traveling both forwards AND backwards in time. The collapse to an optimal path gives us the illusion of only going forwards in time. The arrow is the collapsed optimal path which appears to only go forward in time. If so, then some of our "history" can be information transmitted to the past in order to create our future (and our present). And that includes legends and mythologies, so yes, Revelations, for instance, seems to have future weapons in it. With this theory that's because it actually hasn't happened yet, but was information sent to the past about what will happen in order to MAKE it happen. Parts of Genesis appear also to actually be stories about the future, not the past. So the future is an active participant in creating itself. Which means there is no way to know what knowledge is future knowledge transmitted to the past, unless that future wishes you to know, and then of course you CAN know. And there seem to be no limits. (So yes, conceivably you can get winning lottery numbers from the future, but ONLY if the future needs you to have that information to create itself.) And if you can understand all of that you gotta be a singular type of human being as it is very confusing. But one thing is clear, if I'm talking about it, and I'm right, then the only reason I know to even tell it is because the future needs me to know and needs me to tell it for that future to exist. It seems to me that such mind-numbing information would have a predictably large impact on a human population, which is why people haven't maybe really known it before; therefore, it seems likely some epic event is about to occur, which is allowing the information to be known. For various reasons the idea is floating around that the "end of the world" is in 2012. My memory is that Sir Isaac Newton actually calculated the correct year and he got 2010, but I've seen no mention of that in the record, so I'm not sure why I have that number. It may be future knowledge. James Harris
From: 7 on 15 Nov 2009 10:26 JSH wrote: > One of the weirder things that has emerged from my mathematical > research is the possibility of continual transmission of information > from the future to the past in order to CREATE the future, where key > is what I call the optimal path algorithm. > > Used against the Traveling Salesman Problem it gives you a traveler > going backwards in time to meet himself, where the algorithm requires > continual communication between the two travelers in order to get the > optimal path. > > If that is a routine part of nature then light takes the optimal path > in that way, and it also gives an arrow to time--we think we're > traveling forward in the future as we're the collapsed path, when > actually we're traveling both forwards AND backwards in time. > > The collapse to an optimal path gives us the illusion of only going > forwards in time. > > The arrow is the collapsed optimal path which appears to only go > forward in time. > > If so, then some of our "history" can be information transmitted to > the past in order to create our future (and our present). > > And that includes legends and mythologies, so yes, Revelations, for > instance, seems to have future weapons in it. With this theory that's > because it actually hasn't happened yet, but was information sent to > the past about what will happen in order to MAKE it happen. > > Parts of Genesis appear also to actually be stories about the future, > not the past. Totally vague argument. If only you could send a lottery win number into the past in a clear and useful way to prove it, then you would. Sending a 16 digit number is nothing compared to sending back chapters for a book. > It may be future knowledge. > > > James Harris
From: sanboz on 15 Nov 2009 12:57 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:04874ca3-d17f-4100-8439-437d1ad11d23(a)h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > One of the weirder things that has emerged from my mathematical > research is the possibility of continual transmission of information > from the future to the past in order to CREATE the future, where key > is what I call the optimal path algorithm. Join the Ashtar Command, they do that all the time. They have "channelers" that get furure information from Aliens in Spaceeships waiting to land, and beam it to Earth where it is used for profit by the Channelers. I am sure the path is sub-optimal, as they (Aliens) are not here yet, although they can talk to us. > > Used against the Traveling Salesman Problem it gives you a traveler > going backwards in time to meet himself, where the algorithm requires > continual communication between the two travelers in order to get the > optimal path. What if he does it twice, then there would be 4 ? that would be a 2 ^ k problem, and 2 ^ k different paths > > If that is a routine part of nature then light takes the optimal path > in that way, and it also gives an arrow to time--we think we're > traveling forward in the future as we're the collapsed path, when > actually we're traveling both forwards AND backwards in time. arrow OF time. not "to" > > The collapse to an optimal path gives us the illusion of only going > forwards in time. and some of us stay stuck, with illusion of being sucessful > > The arrow is the collapsed optimal path which appears to only go > forward in time. > > If so, then some of our "history" can be information transmitted to > the past in order to create our future (and our present). but history is created by the present, and is already over in the past. > > And that includes legends and mythologies, so yes, Revelations, for > instance, seems to have future weapons in it. It does not, read it, you have been watching too much TV > With this theory that's > because it actually hasn't happened yet, but was information sent to > the past about what will happen in order to MAKE it happen. > > Parts of Genesis appear also to actually be stories about the future, > not the past. appear, stories ? sounds like fiction, dude > > So the future is an active participant in creating itself. circular thinking, what gave you that idea, "itself" ?? > > Which means there is no way to know what knowledge is future knowledge > transmitted to the past, unless that future wishes you to know, and > then of course you CAN know. And there seem to be no limits. (So > yes, conceivably you can get winning lottery numbers from the future, > but ONLY if the future needs you to have that information to create > itself.) Therefore, you must accept the fact that your research is still meaningless into the future, because it is not sucessful in the past > > And if you can understand all of that you gotta be a singular type of > human being as it is very confusing. But one thing is clear, if I'm > talking about it, and I'm right, then the only reason I know to even > tell it is because the future needs me to know and needs me to tell it > for that future to exist. You should advise Obama. > > It seems to me that such mind-numbing information would have a > predictably large impact on a human population, which is why people > haven't maybe really known it before; therefore, it seems likely some > epic event is about to occur, which is allowing the information to be > known. if it is "mind-numbing", nobody wants to hear it or understand it. > > For various reasons the idea is floating around that the "end of the > world" is in 2012. My memory is that Sir Isaac Newton actually > calculated the correct year and he got 2010, but I've seen no mention > of that in the record, so I'm not sure why I have that number. go see the movie, numb-nuts. It will tell you your past future what to tell you to do for your future past. > > It may be future knowledge. "future knowledge" = "guessing" > > > James Harris
From: Owen Jacobson on 15 Nov 2009 14:59 On 2009-11-14 23:38:49 -0500, JSH <jstevh(a)gmail.com> said: > One of the weirder things that has emerged from my mathematical > research is the possibility of continual transmission of information > from the future to the past in order to CREATE the future, where key > is what I call the optimal path algorithm. > > Used against the Traveling Salesman Problem it gives you a traveler > going backwards in time to meet himself, where the algorithm requires > continual communication between the two travelers in order to get the > optimal path. You have attached unwarranted, semi-mystical importance to the "backwards" part of your trivial variation on bidirectional search[1]. It does not imply time travel; you can model it just as well by thinking of two travellers, one going forward through the original graph, and one going forward through a reversed version of the original graph. It'd serve you well to read up on how others have already solved graph problems in general, and NP-complete graph problems specifically, before running around trumpeting your "innovations". It's a pity you won't. -o [1] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bidirectional_search> for starters.
From: Amy on 15 Nov 2009 20:22
"JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:04874ca3-d17f-4100-8439-437d1ad11d23(a)h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com... <snip> > James Harris Man ! What a decline in intelligence their has been over the years in JSH posts. Guess you don't read very much. Especially not math or physics. Too bad, I used to think you were smart, but now ? The cheese has slid off your cracker, dude. |