|
From: Anonymous on 7 May 2008 11:35 In article <68duetF2ritg7U1(a)mid.individual.net>, Pete Dashwood <dashwood(a)removethis.enternet.co.nz> wrote: > > >"chuck" <charles.leviton(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >news:b771707f-7b70-4d26-a01d-ccd21d0e6ef5(a)m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... >> On May 5, 11:22 pm, Robert <n...(a)e.mail> wrote: >>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT), Pakku <pa...(a)soccermail.com> >>> wrote: ><snip> >> >> But attempts at conversions get bogged down with changed business >> specifications. As soon as system users hear there is going to be a >> conversion they want all these new requirements to be incorporated- >> kind of like "While you are in there making this change, why not make >> this additional teensy change as well" that most programmers know >> about! > >Yeah, users are the pits... Always wanting something, never satisified. Mr Dashwood, consider the following: Given that a corporation has finite resources then how are user changes (which consume resources) to be co-ordinated and allocated in a manner which is not reflective of 'the squeakiest wheel' and which is most profitable to the organisation? Never mind that 'I know it's what I told you but it's not what I want TODAY' is demoralising for everyone involved... it Costs Money. DD
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Is there any COBOL program for verify the SSN? Next: COBOL Compiler for Windows |