June 2010 Updates
in [Windows Update]
|
Prev: Windows Media (Media Center, Media Player) Fails to Install
Next: Support for ALL .NET Framework SECURITY update installation issues
From: John on 8 Jun 2010 14:32 I use IE8 to go to Windows Update to check for new updates today. I see the following update detected as needed on my Windows Server 2003 R2 SP2 box: Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 Security Update for Windows Server 2003 x86 and Windows Server 2003 R2 x86 (KB979907) My server Add/Remove Programs doesn't have Framework 1.1 listed. There is Framework 2.0 SP1 listed there. So the question is, why do I need .NET Framework 1.1 if I have .NET Framework 2.0 installed?
From: MowGreen on 8 Jun 2010 14:48 Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 ships as part of Windows Server 2003. Since there is updates for that Framework appearing today, this may come in handy - How to repair the .NET Framework 1.1 that ships as part of the OS on Windows Server 2003 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2005/06/21/431385.aspx MowGreen ================ *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten ================ banthecheck.com "Security updates should *never* have *non-security content* prechecked John wrote: > I use IE8 to go to Windows Update to check for new updates today. > > I see the following update detected as needed on my Windows Server 2003 R2 > SP2 box: > > Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 Security Update for Windows Server 2003 x86 > and Windows Server 2003 R2 x86 (KB979907) > > My server Add/Remove Programs doesn't have Framework 1.1 listed. There is > Framework 2.0 SP1 listed there. So the question is, why do I need .NET > Framework 1.1 if I have .NET Framework 2.0 installed? > >
From: John on 8 Jun 2010 14:59 That explains it. Thanks much for your quick reply, MowGreen. "MowGreen" <mowgreen(a)nowandzen.com> wrote in message news:urf$wszBLHA.5848(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 ships as part of Windows Server 2003. Since > there is updates for that Framework appearing today, this may come in > handy - > > How to repair the .NET Framework 1.1 that ships as part of the OS on > Windows Server 2003 > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2005/06/21/431385.aspx > > > > MowGreen > ================ > *-343-* FDNY > Never Forgotten > ================ > > banthecheck.com > "Security updates should *never* have *non-security content* prechecked > > John wrote: >> I use IE8 to go to Windows Update to check for new updates today. >> >> I see the following update detected as needed on my Windows Server 2003 >> R2 >> SP2 box: >> >> Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 Security Update for Windows Server 2003 >> x86 >> and Windows Server 2003 R2 x86 (KB979907) >> >> My server Add/Remove Programs doesn't have Framework 1.1 listed. There is >> Framework 2.0 SP1 listed there. So the question is, why do I need .NET >> Framework 1.1 if I have .NET Framework 2.0 installed? >> >>
From: MowGreen on 8 Jun 2010 15:04 John wrote: > That explains it. > Thanks much for your quick reply, MowGreen. You're mowst welcome, John and good luck with the massive amount of updates ... or should I call them the Perfect Storm of Updates ? <w> MowGreen ================ *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten ================ banthecheck.com "Security updates should *never* have *non-security content* prechecked
From: John on 8 Jun 2010 17:43
2 Win2003 servers updated without any problem. 3 more Win2003 servers and about 50 WinXP boxes to update. Keeping my fingers crossed. "MowGreen" <mowgreen(a)nowandzen.com> wrote in message news:OX1Cu1zBLHA.1368(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > John wrote: >> That explains it. >> Thanks much for your quick reply, MowGreen. > > > You're mowst welcome, John and good luck with the massive amount of > updates ... or should I call them the Perfect Storm of Updates ? <w> > |