Kernel Panic/ Error 15
in [Linux Help]
|
Prev: Tftp server problem
Next: apt-get in Suse?
From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k) on 30 Jun 2008 06:52 > I wonder how relevant my linux distro's mention here would be but > nonetheless it is RHEL5. There may be an easier way to compile your kernel. At least, that's the case for my Ubuntu-8.04. RHEL5? That's really old.... why not use Fedora 9? I think the latest version of RHEL is 8, right? -- @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04) Linux 2.6.25.9 ^ ^ 18:49:01 up 7:34 1 user load average: 1.03 1.03 1.00 ? ? (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa/
From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k) on 30 Jun 2008 06:53 > I wonder how relevant my linux distro's mention here would be but > nonetheless it is RHEL5. BTW, you don't have to use a distribution that called itself a server to set up a linux server. Any distribution would do. -- @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04) Linux 2.6.25.9 ^ ^ 18:51:01 up 7:36 1 user load average: 1.02 1.04 1.00 ? ? (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa/
From: Artnut on 30 Jun 2008 10:07 "Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)" <toylet.toylet(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4868bad6(a)127.0.0.1... >> I wonder how relevant my linux distro's mention here would be but >> nonetheless it is RHEL5. > > BTW, you don't have to use a distribution that called itself a > server to set up a linux server. Any distribution would do. > Aah..... I have used a bit of Ubuntu, one of the earliest versions, I cant remember which one and also used RH9 and Fedora 6. Then for some time used Suse 10. I merely wanted to try a few distros. To be honest, most of my work is on Windows but I try to use as much Linux as I can. The issue with trying Linux distros is that each time I have to let go of whatever data I have. So far haven't figured out where to get it backed up. The kernel installation was just one of my learning by trial and error methods. Appreciate all help given to me. BTW, a bit OT here. May I know why is your signature so big, large, huge? Regards, Arty
From: Artnut on 30 Jun 2008 10:09 "Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)" <toylet.toylet(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4868baa0$1(a)127.0.0.1... >> I wonder how relevant my linux distro's mention here would be but >> nonetheless it is RHEL5. > > There may be an easier way to compile your kernel. At least, > that's the case for my Ubuntu-8.04. > > RHEL5? That's really old.... why not use Fedora 9? I think > the latest version of RHEL is 8, right? > > -- Fedora 9 maybe right version but RHEL is still at version 5. In some offices RH 7, 8 and 9 are still strong and sturdy WITHOUT major issues. Arty
From: J.O. Aho on 30 Jun 2008 14:40
Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k) wrote: >> I wonder how relevant my linux distro's mention here would be but >> nonetheless it is RHEL5. > > There may be an easier way to compile your kernel. At least, > that's the case for my Ubuntu-8.04. I say it's as easy to compile a kernel, regardless of version, distribution or architecture and there is always a chance for someone who don't read properly to make a bad mistake. > RHEL5? That's really old.... why not use Fedora 9? I think > the latest version of RHEL is 8, right? No RHEL has a lower version numbering than the Fedora which is the devel version of RHEL, if I remember it right RHEL5=FC8. You are thinking about RH-series, where version 9 was the last one and should be "the same as" RHEL2. -- //Aho |