MBAM Version 1.45 patch for Windows 2000 | Win 2K
in [Spyware]
|
From: siljaline on 31 Mar 2010 23:12 See: > ( Please read carefully *before* using ) <http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=45321> Share as you wish. Quote where you got the information. Thanks, Silj -- "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
From: Buffalo on 31 Mar 2010 23:56 siljaline wrote: > See: > > ( Please read carefully *before* using ) > <http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=45321> > > Share as you wish. Quote where you got the information. > > Thanks, > > Silj That is only for the paid version, so please read the info as Silj recommended. I had troubles installing the free version 1.45 of MBAM on my Win2000Pro SP4 system. The original file name was mbam-setup-1.45.exe and were 5,918,720 bytes and ver 1.45.0.0 and the fixed one was mbam.setup.exe and it was 5,922,816 bytes and ver 1.45.0.0, just in case any Win2000Pro SP4 users still have a problem with the ver1.45 install. The fixed version installed without a hitch and works just fine. Buffalo
From: siljaline on 1 Apr 2010 15:21 Buffalo wrote: > siljaline wrote: >> See: > >> ( Please read carefully *before* using ) >> <http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=45321> >> >> Share as you wish. Quote where you got the information. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Silj > > That is only for the paid version, so please read the info as Silj > recommended. > I had troubles installing the free version 1.45 of MBAM on my Win2000Pro SP4 > system. The original file name was mbam-setup-1.45.exe and were 5,918,720 > bytes and ver 1.45.0.0 and the fixed one was mbam.setup.exe and it was > 5,922,816 bytes and ver 1.45.0.0, just in case any Win2000Pro SP4 users > still have a problem with the ver1.45 install. > The fixed version installed without a hitch and works just fine. Yes, the wording is a bit misleading, I wasn't quite sure what to make of it either. Glad you are good to go. Cheers, Silj -- "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Malwarebytes' v 1.45 update/upgrade question Next: 1/2 year reviews on antivirus software |