From: Jiri Slaby on
Hi,

stanse found a locking error in lirc_dev_fop_read:
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&ir->irctl_lock))
return -ERESTARTSYS;
....
while (written < length && ret == 0) {
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&ir->irctl_lock)) { #1
ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
break;
}
...
}

remove_wait_queue(&ir->buf->wait_poll, &wait);
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
mutex_unlock(&ir->irctl_lock); #2

If lock at #1 fails, it beaks out of the loop, with the lock unlocked,
but there is another "unlock" at #2.

regards,
--
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Jarod Wilson on
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 02:52:58PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> stanse found a locking error in lirc_dev_fop_read:
> if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&ir->irctl_lock))
> return -ERESTARTSYS;
> ...
> while (written < length && ret == 0) {
> if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&ir->irctl_lock)) { #1
> ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> break;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> remove_wait_queue(&ir->buf->wait_poll, &wait);
> set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> mutex_unlock(&ir->irctl_lock); #2
>
> If lock at #1 fails, it beaks out of the loop, with the lock unlocked,
> but there is another "unlock" at #2.

Yeah, ok, I see the problem there, should be able to get a patch to fix it
in flight later today.

Thanks much,

--
Jarod Wilson
jarod(a)redhat.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/