Prev: Generic term for geometrical elements intersecting or one enclosedby the other
Next: Goldbach proof by Fermat's Infinite Descent, Mathematical Induction#5.26 Correcting Math
From: Igor on 12 Aug 2010 10:49
On Aug 11, 2:28 pm, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
>  Current mathematics is erroneously based on half = halfline, Whilst
> real mathematics is a -1 tangent, that dips 0.1 at each end over- 1
> tangent at prime 59 , 41. Prime numbers 59 and 41 are the key numbers
>
>  59-9=50
>
> 41+9 = 50
>
>  that is 1/10 tangent, from -1 +1 to 10
>
> 0.999---------------------(1/10x1/10=0.01*1/10-=.
> 001)------------------------------1
>
>  9+.001=1   and  10 -.001=.999
>
>  NOW LOOK HERE YOU FERMATISTS, TO EQUALIZE THE EQUATION AT THE CENTER
>
> Midline spread is 59-41 = 18
>
> .59/18=0..03277777777778
>
> .41/18= 0.022 77777777778
>
>  Difference is 0.001 you (stupid) Fermatists!! at the sentinel value
> 0.032-0.022=0.01 x.01=0.001
>
>  Because negative, the minus  - is weighted, to compute a value from a
> minus to + you really need x x  +1x-1x-1=1. Fermatists  your basic
> concepts are wrong , you say that 1x-1=1 that is wrong, you need x, x
> so +1= 1x(-1x-1)=1. This is a great flaw in your mathematics. To have
> a sesaw that is at a tangent to the opposite  tangent, you need two xx
> step , first to bring it level x, and then bring it to  opposite
> tangent x again
>
>  Hope Research

Maybe you should start hoping for some real research instead of that
numerically drooling mindless insanity you been spewing for months
now.

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Generic term for geometrical elements intersecting or one enclosedby the other
Next: Goldbach proof by Fermat's Infinite Descent, Mathematical Induction#5.26 Correcting Math