|
From: aerosmith on 10 Dec 2006 11:48 Hi, Could anyone give me some differences between MIPS and the ARM architecture. I am not looking for very low (close to hardware) level information but just to know which architecture has/lacks what features. Thanks in advance.
From: jon@beniston.com on 11 Dec 2006 07:41 > Could anyone give me some differences between MIPS and the ARM > architecture. I am not looking for very low (close to hardware) level > information but just to know which architecture has/lacks what features. Here's a few little things: More GPR in MIPS. Special purpose multiply registers in MIPS. Register banking in ARM. Predicated instructions in ARM. Stoopid barrel shifter for one operand in ARM. Cheers, Jon
From: Paul A. Clayton on 11 Dec 2006 09:29 jon(a)beniston.com wrote: [snip] > More GPR in MIPS. Special purpose multiply registers in MIPS. Register > banking in ARM. Predicated instructions in ARM. Stoopid barrel shifter > for one operand in ARM. Don't MIPS' Shadow Register Sets act similar to ARM's banked registers (i.e., providing some registers for interrupt contexts--except with MIPS it is a full set of 31 GPRs)? Also I don't think ARM has a branch/jump delay slot, correct? ARM also has a load/store multiple registers instruction, correct? ARM defines the Program Counter as a GPR. I don't think ARM reserves a hard-wired-to-zero register (as MIPS certainly does). Paul A. Clayton one who never really looked at the ARM ARM but who has a minimal familiarity with MIPS
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Torben_=C6gidius_Mogensen?= on 11 Dec 2006 10:25 "Paul A. Clayton" <paaronclayton(a)earthlink.net> writes: > jon(a)beniston.com wrote: > [snip] >> More GPR in MIPS. Special purpose multiply registers in MIPS. Register >> banking in ARM. Predicated instructions in ARM. Stoopid barrel shifter >> for one operand in ARM. Why stupid? > Also I don't think ARM has a branch/jump delay slot, correct? Correct. > ARM also has a load/store multiple registers instruction, correct? Correct. > ARM defines the Program Counter as a GPR. Correct. > I don't think ARM reserves a hard-wired-to-zero register (as MIPS > certainly does). Correct. Also: - ARM has condition flags (x86-style) where MIPS has branch-equal / branch-not-equal instructions and for more complex comparisons needs to set condition codes in GPRs (using set-less-than, etc.) and test these by BEQ/BNE. - ARM has auto-increment/decrement on load/store instructions and can scale register-based offsets. - ARM has a carry flag that makes multi-word integers easy to handle. Torben
From: Tim McCaffrey on 11 Dec 2006 13:58 In article <hTWeh.53235$rv4.7765(a)edtnps90>, aerosmith(a)pandoras.box says... > >Hi, > >Could anyone give me some differences between MIPS and the ARM >architecture. I am not looking for very low (close to hardware) level >information but just to know which architecture has/lacks what features. > >Thanks in advance. Interrupt handling, address modes, PSW (or not), # GPRs, floating point, size of GPRs, where IP is located (one of GPRs or not), how long constants are loaded. The biggest difference between the two, from a higher level, is probably floating point and addressing size: MIPS64 implementations usually have floating point, and can address > 4G easily. ARM's support for FP is limited, and usually not included, and it is a 32 bit architecture. From an embedded point of view, the other difference might be that you don't have to turn paging on with the MIPS to enable the cache. - Tim
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: First Next-Gen CELL Processor: 2 PPEs - 32 SPEs - at least 1 Teraflop Next: Multiple mappings |