Milestones
in [Solaris]
|
From: Oleksii Dzhulai on 23 Apr 2008 10:57 Hi! As you know 10 the recommended way of changing runlevels is through SMF on Solaris 10. For example: #svcadm milestone single-user It is a knew way. The old way was through init command, for example: #init 1 and it works also. So a question is. Changing runlevel in a new way I don't see changes with "who -r" command. It keeps to show old runlevel. Is it ok or may be I do something wrong? Thanks. --- http://unixinmind.com
From: usenetpersongerryt on 23 Apr 2008 12:05 On Apr 23, 7:57 am, Oleksii Dzhulai <nixl...(a)unixinmind.com> wrote: > > As you know 10 the recommended way of changing runlevels is through > SMF on Solaris 10. > For example: > #svcadm milestone single-user > It is a knew way. > The old way was through init command, for example: > #init 1 and it works also. > So a question is. Changing runlevel in a new way I don't see changes > with "who -r" command. It keeps to show old runlevel. Is it ok or may > be I do something wrong? man svcadm says: "Changing the system's current milestone with the "mile- stone" subcommand will not change the current run level of the system. To change the system's run level, invoke /sbin/init directly."
From: Oleksii Dzhulai on 24 Apr 2008 03:05 On Apr 23, 7:05 pm, usenetpersonger...(a)gmail.com wrote: > On Apr 23, 7:57 am, Oleksii Dzhulai <nixl...(a)unixinmind.com> wrote: > > > > > As you know 10 the recommended way of changing runlevels is through > > SMF on Solaris 10. > > For example: > > #svcadm milestone single-user > > It is a knew way. > > The old way was through init command, for example: > > #init 1 and it works also. > > So a question is. Changing runlevel in a new way I don't see changes > > with "who -r" command. It keeps to show old runlevel. Is it ok or may > > be I do something wrong? > > man svcadm says: > "Changing the system's current milestone with the "mile- > stone" subcommand will not change the current run level > of the system. To change the system's run level, invoke > /sbin/init directly." Oh! Thank you I was not attentive.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: nvramrc Next: when zone boot, it ignores some entries in sysidcfg |