From: Henry on
Until now I am using dBase databases, the server is marked as disk "M:
\", the default directorey is "M:\...", so every opening of a database
is performed automatically on the server.
There are only 7 computers on the net.

In order to speed performance, I am considering passing to SQL.
How can I do it with minimum edit of the existing code?
Can I await a considerable change in performance?

Many thanks for any hint
Henry.
From: Geoff Schaller on
Henry.

You need a class based approach, such as that which I am doing now with
about 12 companies around the globe. Check out my website for white
papers (it is slow at the moment so please be patient - our fault) at
www.sofwareobjectives.com.au/voconversion

There is a lot of reading there.

Basically, we can convert a DBF oriented app to SQL in a few weeks (say
250,000 lines of code, 150 tables and 50 browsers) and your code will
largely stay in DBF syntax. This can work for MS SQL, DB2 or Oracle.

Or you can write lots of SQL and take forever <g>.

Geoff



"Henry" <ZodcomAG(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cb073750-0080-4c2c-940f-ee82475c3006(a)e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:

> Until now I am using dBase databases, the server is marked as disk "M:
> \", the default directorey is "M:\...", so every opening of a database
> is performed automatically on the server.
> There are only 7 computers on the net.
>
> In order to speed performance, I am considering passing to SQL.
> How can I do it with minimum edit of the existing code?
> Can I await a considerable change in performance?
>
> Many thanks for any hint
> Henry.

From: Geoff Schaller on
Oops. The correct URL is:

http://www.softwareobjectives.com.au/voconversion

Geoff

From: Willie Moore on
Geoff,

I agree, rewritting a lot of SQL from your DBF queries can take forever <g>.

Regards,

Willie


"Geoff Schaller" <geoffx(a)softxwareobjectives.com.au> wrote in message news:486b6752$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> Henry.
>
> You need a class based approach, such as that which I am doing now with
> about 12 companies around the globe. Check out my website for white
> papers (it is slow at the moment so please be patient - our fault) at
> www.sofwareobjectives.com.au/voconversion
>
> There is a lot of reading there.
>
> Basically, we can convert a DBF oriented app to SQL in a few weeks (say
> 250,000 lines of code, 150 tables and 50 browsers) and your code will
> largely stay in DBF syntax. This can work for MS SQL, DB2 or Oracle.
>
> Or you can write lots of SQL and take forever <g>.
>
> Geoff
>
>
>
> "Henry" <ZodcomAG(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:cb073750-0080-4c2c-940f-ee82475c3006(a)e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Until now I am using dBase databases, the server is marked as disk "M:
>> \", the default directorey is "M:\...", so every opening of a database
>> is performed automatically on the server.
>> There are only 7 computers on the net.
>>
>> In order to speed performance, I am considering passing to SQL.
>> How can I do it with minimum edit of the existing code?
>> Can I await a considerable change in performance?
>>
>> Many thanks for any hint
>> Henry.
>
From: richard.townsendrose on
Geoff,

seems like your lib will be the best way forward.

presumably therefore as advantage is sql compliant, then once an app
is converted to sql, it can still be set up to use advantage.

richard
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: MLE Cursor Position
Next: Source control problem