From: Bill on
Thanks in advance for any help.

I'm currently using an 802.11g wireless access point. The devices in
my house that connect to it are all 802.11g. I am having some signal
issues in parts of the house.

I know I won't get faster speeds, but is there any advantage to using
an 802.11n device as the access point in terms of range, if all the
devices are 802.11g?

Thanks again
From: seaweedsl on

No, I don't think an N router operating in G mode will offer any
advantage. In fact, may reduce your current options if it doesn't
have removable antennas.

Instead, why don't you go ahead and give us a description of your
router model and the various devices that connect to it. Describe your
house layout and where the problems are.

There is almost certainly a good solution using G, perhaps with a
higher gain antenna (or reflector) perhaps adding a second AP
connected by cable or powerline networking to your existing router.

Steve
From: Bill on
Thanks very much for the help.

I have an older, brick, plaster-walled house. There are two stories
and a finished basement. I have a Linksys BEFSR81 router in a room on
the second floor into which the Comcast cable comes and my main
desktop PC lives. This room is wired to 2 bedrooms on the second
floor, one room on the first floor, and the main living area in the
basement. In one of the bedrooms on the second floor, I have a Linksys
WAP54G with the 7dB antennae. I put the WAP in a bedroom because the
room with the cable has a ton of electronics. The room on the first
floor has not been good for the WAP because it's built on a concrete
slab and really is apart from the rest of the house. That room has the
family computer, wired to the BEFSR81.

I have 2 daughters in college who use their laptops when they are home
for breaks and the summer. They work in a room on the first floor that
gets good, but not great, signal. I'd like to get better signal in
that room.

On the first floor, just below the WAP, I have a TiVo and a music
device (SquuezeBox) that essentially plays music from the internet. I
don't use it to connect to a music server in the house. I also have an
iPod Touch and a cellphone with wifi that I like to roam with. We have
an outside porch and I get no signal there. In addition to better
signal for the kids' laptops, I'd love to be able to get signal on the
porch.

I have tried the Linksys range expander. It worked well for signal to
the laptops (but not the outside porch), but kept disconnecting from
the WAP. I kept having to reset it.

Thanks very much for any suggestions.

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:05:52 -0700 (PDT), seaweedsl
<seaweedsteve(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
>No, I don't think an N router operating in G mode will offer any
>advantage. In fact, may reduce your current options if it doesn't
>have removable antennas.
>
> Instead, why don't you go ahead and give us a description of your
>router model and the various devices that connect to it. Describe your
>house layout and where the problems are.
>
>There is almost certainly a good solution using G, perhaps with a
>higher gain antenna (or reflector) perhaps adding a second AP
>connected by cable or powerline networking to your existing router.
>
>Steve
From: mlrodrig on

> I know I won't get faster speeds, but is there any advantage to using
> an 802.11n device as the access point in terms of range, if all the
> devices are 802.11g?
Definitely not. Indeed, as 802.11n APs has a natural coverage
advantage (due to technology) vendors are building them with an
average output power lower than traditionally found 802.11g AP (not a
rule, but it is for sure a tendency). So replacing your G AP with N AP
will - very likely - reduce your 802.11g devices coverage range.


From: Bill on
You are absolutely correct. I tried it, just for kicks. My results
were worse with the N router and I returned to my all-G setup.

Thanks for the response.


On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:49:49 -0700 (PDT), "mlrodrig(a)gmail.com"
<mlrodrig(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> I know I won't get faster speeds, but is there any advantage to using
>> an 802.11n device as the access point in terms of range, if all the
>> devices are 802.11g?
>Definitely not. Indeed, as 802.11n APs has a natural coverage
>advantage (due to technology) vendors are building them with an
>average output power lower than traditionally found 802.11g AP (not a
>rule, but it is for sure a tendency). So replacing your G AP with N AP
>will - very likely - reduce your 802.11g devices coverage range.
>