From: Joerg on
Hi,

people using NVIDIA binaries please look here for kernel 2.6.25:
www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=280afbc3bf85cf9527cdbbe4c347a686&t=110088

Joerg
--
For email use g m x d o t n e t
From: Dave Uhring on
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:18:30 +0200, Joerg wrote:

> people using NVIDIA binaries please look here for kernel 2.6.25-rc*:

Fixed that for you.

From: Joerg on
Dave Uhring wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:18:30 +0200, Joerg wrote:
>
>> people using NVIDIA binaries please look here for kernel
>> 2.6.25-rc*:
>
> Fixed that for you.

Nope, the patch iis also necessary on 2.6.25.

Joerg
--
For email use g m x d o t n e t
From: Dave Uhring on
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:04:43 +0200, Joerg wrote:
> Dave Uhring wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:18:30 +0200, Joerg wrote:
>>
>>> people using NVIDIA binaries please look here for kernel
>>> 2.6.25-rc*:
>>
>> Fixed that for you.
>
> Nope, the patch iis also necessary on 2.6.25.

Not so indicated at your URL. The title of the article is pretty clear.
"Using NVIDIA Linux graphics drivers with Linux 2.6.25-rc*" and no mention
is made of the release kernel.

Perhaps the requirement for the release kernel is posted somewhere else?

From: Joerg on
Dave Uhring wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:04:43 +0200, Joerg wrote:
>> Dave Uhring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:18:30 +0200, Joerg wrote:
>>>
>>>> people using NVIDIA binaries please look here for kernel
>>>> 2.6.25-rc*:
>>>
>>> Fixed that for you.
>>
>> Nope, the patch iis also necessary on 2.6.25.
>
> Not so indicated at your URL. The title of the article is
> pretty clear. "Using NVIDIA Linux graphics drivers with Linux
> 2.6.25-rc*" and no mention is made of the release kernel.
>
> Perhaps the requirement for the release kernel is posted
> somewhere else?

Perhaps you care to compare article date and kernel release date.
Anyway, installation of NVIDIA binary 169.12 on slack-curent fails
w/o the patch.

Joerg
--
For email use g m x d o t n e t