New '80s Show
in [Firewalls]
|
Prev: Configuring a VPN client for a dlink dfl800 firewall
Next: Connecting to VPN Router That's Behind Another Router
From: Chilly8 on 30 Jan 2008 01:58 X-No-Archive: Yes "Leythos" <void(a)nowhere.lan> wrote in message news:MPG.22096e051d0867899899ee(a)Adfree.usenet.com... > In article <fnnvvm$spp$1(a)aioe.org>, chilly8(a)hotmail.com says... >> And in these tough >> economic times, sponsors want more from their their >> money, when it comes to running ads, so I oblige >> both the producer and the advertisers to make sure that >> the the money that is paid to the producers gets the most >> results. > > And evil doers always have an excuse, like you do, "tough economic > times" does not justify unethical actions, except for corrupt people > that have no ethics. For talk and sports programming, we use a Shoutcast feed, and during the Euiropean figure skating championships last week, I saw a lot of connections to the Shoutcast feed from office networks all over Europe, during the week. Beucase I have the Shoutcast server running on a port other than 8000, it is available in more workplaces. I have it on a very high port. And since I am not in any web filter lists (which I frequently check), any talk or sports programming we run on the Shoutcast server WILL be heard in most workplaces. Anything from a Shoutcast server, unlike with Live 365, can still be heard with Windows Media Player, without having to be a techno-wiz, so someone could merly plug in the address of my Shoutcast server into Windows Media Player, after they get to work, and they are good to go. You can even listen to a Shoutcast server through a "web proxy" server, such as phpProxy, and I did see a LOT of connections from those, during last week's broadcast of the European figure skating championships.
From: Leythos on 31 Jan 2008 03:48 In article <fnp76v$kbn$1(a)aioe.org>, chilly8(a)hotmail.com says... > Beucase I have > the Shoutcast server running on a port other than 8000, > it is available in more workplaces. Except, again, on 8000 or 80 or 443, your service would not be accessible from any properly configured firewall in any company that cared. Nothing you've posed in the few years I've seen your posts shows you as anything except an unethical business person with very limited knowledge of anything related to the internet or networking or security. -- Leythos - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum. - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist" spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Chilly8 on 1 Feb 2008 14:07 X-No-Archive: Yes I just formally welcomed his show to the lineup. Given rhe results of the web logs, and connect attempts made through php and cgi proxy installations all over the globe, I have a show in the lineup that could really reel in the listeners. Most of the phpProxy sites are hosted on server farms that cater to business users, so blocking anything from these server farms could also cut off business-related sites as well. This is why most phpProxy operators do this, to make it more difficult for businesses to block them without resorting to expensive filtering software. No business in their right mind is going to block access to work-related sites just to block proxy sites.
From: Sebastian G. on 1 Feb 2008 16:58 Chilly8 wrote: > Most of the phpProxy sites are hosted on server farms that > cater to business users, so blocking anything from these > server farms could also cut off business-related sites > as well. Bullshit. > This is why most phpProxy operators do this, > to make it more difficult for businesses to block them > without resorting to expensive filtering software. And the bullshit continues... > No business in their right mind is going to block access to > work-related sites just to block proxy sites. And there' no reason why they should do so.
From: Chilly8 on 1 Feb 2008 19:20
X-No-Archive: Yes "Sebastian G." <seppi(a)seppig.de> wrote in message news:60euj7F1q45tcU1(a)mid.dfncis.de... > Chilly8 wrote: > > >> Most of the phpProxy sites are hosted on server farms that >> cater to business users, so blocking anything from these >> server farms could also cut off business-related sites >> as well. > > > Bullshit. > >> This is why most phpProxy operators do this, >> to make it more difficult for businesses to block them >> without resorting to expensive filtering software. > > > And the bullshit continues... > >> No business in their right mind is going to block access to >> work-related sites just to block proxy sites. > > > And there' no reason why they should do so. This is one thing that is going to make swiss cheese out of Australia's proposed Internet censorship regime. More affluent Australians can simply put their own server in a colocation facility outside of Australia, and then use that to surf the Net, and the Australian authorities will have no idea what they are up to. Packages start for as little as 200 AUD per month. Just access your server with Windows Remote Desktop and start surfing and the authorities in Australia won't know what you are up to. They would know you were connecting to a network on a server farm somewhere, but would not know where you were going beyond that server. Simply put, affluent Australians will be able to circumvent the filtering regime by placing their own server at colocation facilities outside of Australia, and using those to surf the Net. ISP-level filtering in Australia will only hurt the poor, while the rich will just simply be able to put their own servers in colocation facilities outside of Australia and surf wherever they want. |