|
From: Miles Bader on 22 Apr 2008 21:00 Ed <Yenc(a)power-post.org> writes: >>> Intel hasn't made a decent integrated graphics chip to date >> >>Eh? My work pc has some kind of old intel integrated graphics (i845?) > > Some of our work PCs have Intel graphics, they pretty much suck IMO. Do you have anything to back up such a broad claim? As I said in the text you omitted in your quoting, Intel's embedded chips -- even the low-end ones -- seem to work absolutely fine for many tasks that that need some 3d/opengl support to work sanely (blender, compiz, etc). Not the best for gaming certainly, but many, many, uses of 3d have nothing to do with gaming. Of course the (low-end!) intel cards in question also work great for 2d. (something which you, bizarrely denied in a subsequent post). [Note that the reason I know those apps "need" 3d support to work sanely is because I've tried them on systems with a 2d-only card... not fun... :-] -Miles -- Scriptures, n. The sacred books of our holy religion, as distinguished from the false and profane writings on which all other faiths are based.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Cheapest Method to Play DVD With X1250. Next: Updating a driver for ATI graphics card |