|
From: JLC on 20 Apr 2008 02:48 "John Lewis" <john.dsl(a)verizon.net> wrote in message news:ksel04lhouqk66td1016sl1t64pilcaeh6(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:05:44 +0100, "Trimble Bracegirdle" > <no-spam(a)never.spam> wrote: > >>Wise man (?) say: >>>>>"You're joking, right? ...... Running an 8800GTX at 1024x768 with >>everything maxed on a 21" CRT? You're using an 8800GTX 768Mb card to do >>what >>an 8600GT would do at 1024x768.">>>> >> >>Exactly...a year ago the 8800GTX (DX10 etc) looked to make sense & those >>other >>cheaper lower spec 8xxx's were not out . >>The CRT won't last forever anway. > > It sure will last lots longer than the backlight on current generation > LCDs. For both the total lifetime and the (lack of) intensity loss per > year. Take a look at the lumens vs time curve for a typical LCD > backlight. You will not like what you see... at all. Both of these > problems with LCD backlights will only be solved with the universal > availability of LED backlighting (at a denent price). Oh, and getting > a replacement backlight for your LCD -- forget it..... > > John Lewis > I guess I'm like a guy that likes vinyl over CD. Sure the CD sounds great, but there's just something about an old record that sounds better to some people. That's the way I feel about CRT's They just have a great picture and are easier on my eyes then LCD's. I also have a HD CRT. Sure it's not a mammoth set, but what there is to see is amazing. I haven't yet seen an HD set even come close to having the rich color my WEGA has. JLC
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Nvidia Readies Major Product Launch: Tegra Next: cat's 8.4 are outtttttttttttttttttttttttttttt |