Object modeling question
in [OOP]
|
Prev: confused at associaton class in modeling library management system
Next: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
From: Phlip on 14 Apr 2008 07:57 topmind wrote: >> Ignore Topmind and frebe. They are anti-OO P/R guys. > You say that like its a bad thing. Your fun and games might confuse newbs, who haven't learned to read between the lines and recognize how much you like OO.
From: topmind on 14 Apr 2008 12:44 Phlip wrote: > topmind wrote: > > >> Ignore Topmind and frebe. They are anti-OO P/R guys. > > > You say that like its a bad thing. > > Your fun and games might confuse newbs, who haven't learned to read > between the lines and recognize how much you like OO. I love it almost as much as I do your mama! -T-
From: frebe on 17 Apr 2008 00:20
On 12 Apr, 17:16, "H. S. Lahman" <h...(a)pathfindermda.com> wrote: > Responding to siddharthkhare... > > Ignore Topmind and frebe. They are anti-OO P/R guys. Normally you have a disclaimer that OO isn't the best tool for problems that doesn't include "complex processing". I don't think this problem qualify as "complex processing" and I think it would qualify under your definition of "CRUD processing". So I can't see why you should recommend people ignoring a non-OO solution. I would also like to add that I don't label myself as anti-OO. But I think the use of classes/objects should be limited to scenarios there it fit (type definitions and not data structures). //frebe |