|
Prev: Where is TASH?
Next: operations on Directory
From: Martin Krischik on 17 Jan 2008 02:34 I. Levashew schrieb: > Martin Krischik пишет: >> I have another suggestion: A GUI Library based on OpenStep [1]. >> >> Existing GUI Libraries tend to be rather complex with hundreds of >> classes - any binding is a huge work - especially since most GUI >> Libraries are OO - and binding to an OO Lib in another language is >> difficult. And a job without end as all libraries are constantly >> extended. > > As of Leopard Apple started providing BridgeSupport XML files. It's not > an endless job now. It's a virtually one-time job. I am not Mac user so I did did not know about BridgeSupport. Now I looked it up and While BridgeSupport sounds good - will it work with GNUStep as well. Note that the Discussion is about a portable library which should work at least on Windows/Linux/Mac. >> here the Idea: If we create an Objective-Ada pre-processor we are done. >> And the Mac-Ada users would love it ;-). > Why do we need a preprocessor? It'll hurt ability of manipulating source > code with 3rd party utilities. I'm Mac-Ada user, and I'm definitelly not > going to love it. It is opposed to Ada spirit. I though you would love it because it is the only proposal which will give Mac users cocoa support. To remind you, the other options are: GWindows: Native on Windows [1], emulated with Wine on Linux and Mac. GtkAda: Native on Linux, emulated with MinGW in Windows, Carbon based on Mac. QtAda: Native on Linux and Windows [1], X11.app based Mac. AdaStep [2]: Native on Mac (Cocoa) and Linux (GNUStep) emulated with MinGW on Windows. [1] Of course GNAT is based on MinGW - so MinGW will always be part of any Windows Tool Chain - it's just the GUI which I consider native and I might be wrong. [2] Just invented that name ;-) . > I think Objective-C on Mac OS X should be dealt with the same way as COM > on Windows; on Mac OS X we'll just use BridgeSupport XML instead of IDL. You seem to be a Mac user so I trust you on that. And parsing an XML file should be a lot easier then anything else - which is good considering our limited resources. Just the "Will it word with GNUStep?" question is left. Martin -- mailto://krischik(a)users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com
From: Ivan Levashew on 17 Jan 2008 04:06 Martin Krischik пишет: > I am not Mac user so I did did not know about BridgeSupport. Now I > looked it up and While BridgeSupport sounds good - will it work with > GNUStep as well. > > Note that the Discussion is about a portable library which should work > at least on Windows/Linux/Mac. SWIG can provide access to wxWidgets and a lot of other stuff. TASH can also be considered. May be Visual Ada Designer can be ported to Mac OS X. Tcl/Tk on Mac OS X has some i18n issues. The same as X11. User can't change keyboard layout via hotkeys (Command-Space usually). The only way to change layout in X11 apps is to use Input Menu (similar to Language Bar in Windows). Constantly clicking while typing is inconvenient for non-English users so X11 (and Tcl/Tk) applications are very unpopular. But it is solveable. I've maid a patch for Apple X11 to enable hotkeys and the same could probably be done for Wish Shell. > I though you would love it because it is the only proposal which will > give Mac users cocoa support. I don't think mixing semantics is a good idea. It's OK for C languages family to be a frankenstein, but not for Ada. > AdaStep [2] > [2] Just invented that name ;-) . An absolutely blank project already exists on Google Code called Cocoa-GNAT. > Just the "Will it word with GNUStep?" question is left. Provided that: a. Cocoa is a superset of OpenStep b. BridgeSupport files are automatically generated from headers One might try to either get a subset of Cocoa metainfo or use modified generator on GNUStep headers. FYI: Tiger's BridgeSupport files: http://octagram.gorodok.net/Tiger_BS.tar.bz2 (110Kb)
From: Martin Krischik on 17 Jan 2008 05:25 Ivan Levashew schrieb: >> I though you would love it because it is the only proposal which will >> give Mac users cocoa support. > > I don't think mixing semantics is a good idea. It's OK for C languages > family to be a frankenstein, but not for Ada. ;-) >> Just the "Will it word with GNUStep?" question is left. > Provided that: > a. Cocoa is a superset of OpenStep > b. BridgeSupport files are automatically generated from headers > > One might try to either get a subset of Cocoa metainfo or use modified > generator on GNUStep headers. Is the generator available as source? Or would we have to find a Mac user to run the generator for us non-Mac-users. > FYI: Tiger's BridgeSupport files: > http://octagram.gorodok.net/Tiger_BS.tar.bz2 (110Kb) I have a look Martin -- mailto://krischik(a)users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com
From: Ivan Levashew on 17 Jan 2008 22:28 Martin Krischik пишет: > Is the generator available as source? Yes, it is. Homepage of Tiger version: http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/bridgesupport It is said that releases will include generated XML files. However there is no any release yet. Sources (Ruby)&manpages: http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/BridgeSupport/browser/trunk In Leopard BridgeSupport is built-in. I don't know if it's publicly available. It should be, it was part of RubyCocoa. Recent versions of RubyCocoa don't include generator (gen_bridge_metadata.rb) and I don't know where to look for newer versions online.
From: Martin Krischik on 18 Jan 2008 02:24 Ivan Levashew schrieb: > Martin Krischik пишет: >> Is the generator available as source? > Yes, it is. > > Homepage of Tiger version: > http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/bridgesupport Wow - just a mere 2000 lines of Ruby code. I am surprised. And it comes with a dtd as well. Martin -- mailto://krischik(a)users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Where is TASH? Next: operations on Directory |