From: Bruno Luong on
Quite interesting problem. I'm not so sure as John that the
solution does not exist. If you suppose probability
distribution of R=(x1,x2) depends only on |R| (thus in your
case the points are distributed on a disk rather than on a
rectangle), the pdf f(r) of |R| must verifies some integral
equation that I believe there exists a solution. The
integral equation get quit messy with the border, and I'm
too lazy to write it out. If someone is willing to tackle,
feel free to do so.

Bruno
From: John D'Errico on
"Bruno Luong" <b.luong(a)fogale.fr> wrote in message
<fvpjh6$sn5$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
> Quite interesting problem. I'm not so sure as John that the
> solution does not exist. If you suppose probability
> distribution of R=(x1,x2) depends only on |R| (thus in your
> case the points are distributed on a disk rather than on a
> rectangle), the pdf f(r) of |R| must verifies some integral
> equation that I believe there exists a solution. The
> integral equation get quit messy with the border, and I'm
> too lazy to write it out. If someone is willing to tackle,
> feel free to do so.
>
> Bruno

Oh, I'm quite comfortable with the idea that an
exact solution cannot exist on the domains we
have been discussing, especially if you allow the
points to lie strictly inside that domain. As you
approach the diameter of the domain, the distance
distribution must suffer some edge effects, even
for a circular domain.

Even for a circular domain, simplest is to force all
the points to lie on the outer edge of the circle.
This will result in a nearly uniform distance
distribution, since we don't have the radius
issue creeping in. But even that suffers from a
subtle problem. For example,

t = linspace(0,2*pi,2000)';
xy = [cos(t),sin(t)];
d = sqrt(bsxfun(@minus,xy(:,1),xy(:,1)').^2 + ...
bsxfun(@minus,xy(:,2),xy(:,2)').^2);

hist(d(:),200)

Note that at any positive distance less than the
diameter, there are exactly two points at that
distance from any given location.

Even for points that lie uniformly spaced on a
straight line segment, the distance distribution
will be triangular, not uniform. The edge effects
still dominate.

x = linspace(0,1,2000)';
d = pdist(x);
hist(d(:),500)

John
From: Bruno Luong on
John,

I just wonder in which limit one can rigorously extrapolate
a thinking from a discrete data to a continuous pdf of a
random variable.

Let's simplify the problem first. Do you think in 1D there
is still no solution? (your logical seems to hold in 1D)

Bruno


From: John D'Errico on
Here is an interesting sampling scheme on the
unit circle. Its not exactly uniform in distance,
but it is far closer than many others. It is
surely not a good sampling of the complete
domain.

t = rand(1000,1)*1.01*pi;
xy = [cos(t),sin(t)];
d = pdist(xy);
hist(d(:),500)

John
From: John D'Errico on
"John D'Errico" <woodchips(a)rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
<fvq1or$65s$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
> Here is an interesting sampling scheme on the
> unit circle. Its not exactly uniform in distance,
> but it is far closer than many others. It is
> surely not a good sampling of the complete
> domain.
>
> t = rand(1000,1)*1.01*pi;
> xy = [cos(t),sin(t)];
> d = pdist(xy);
> hist(d(:),500)
>
> John

Its is possible that a more fractal scheme might
produce a nearly uniform distance distribution,
as well as fill the domain of interest better.

t = rand(2000,1).^0.2;
xy = [t.*cos(t*2.5*pi),t.*sin(t*2.5*pi)];
subplot(1,2,1)
plot(xy(:,1),xy(:,2),'r.')
d = pdist(xy);
subplot(1,2,2)
hist(d(:),500)

Have fun,
John