From: Carsten Emde on
Dmitry,

>> Here comes the current version of the coretemp patches. Huaxu did the
>> initial work; Jean suggested to submit them directly to Andrew.
>>
>> I made some style changes as advised by checkpatch.
>>
>> The patches have been tested successfully on Core 2 Duo and Quad, and on
>> Nehalem and Nehalem/Westmere where temperature readings were plausible and
>> changed with load as expected. When tested on an Atom processor (N270), the
>> temperature values were identical to previous versions of the coretemp
>> module and also changed with load. However, the readings should be higher
>> by 10 to 15C as compared to the outside temperature of the processor.
>> Huaxu, could you check? I would guess TjMax to be 105 instead of 90C in these
>> processors.
> I apologize, if I ask a stupid question, but are you saying that TjMax in
> coretemp.c should be set to higher value than Tcase-max value specified in
> Intel documents?
Hmm, no. I am saying that I would like the reading to be correct. I have
measured the outside temperature of the case with an infrared
thermometer [1] and found it to be higher than the readings returned by
the coretemp module. In all other CPUs I have, the coretemp readings are
higher than the case temperature.

Carsten.


[1] http://www.osadl.org/uploads/media/IPCworld-2008-4.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/