From: Jeff Moyer on
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi(a)ah.jp.nec.com> writes:

> Basically it is user's responsibility to take care of race condition
> related to direct I/O, but some events which are out of user's control
> (such as memory failure) can happen at any time. So we need to lock and
> set/clear PG_writeback flags in dierct I/O code to protect from data loss.

Did you do any performance testing of this? If not, please do and
report back. I'm betting users won't be pleased with the results.

Cheers,
Jeff

>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi(a)ah.jp.nec.com>
> ---
> fs/direct-io.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> index 7600aac..0d0810d 100644
> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,10 @@ static int dio_bio_complete(struct dio *dio, struct bio *bio)
> struct page *page = bvec[page_no].bv_page;
>
> if (dio->rw == READ && !PageCompound(page))
> - set_page_dirty_lock(page);
> + set_page_dirty(page);
> + if (dio->rw & WRITE)
> + end_page_writeback(page);
> + unlock_page(page);
> page_cache_release(page);
> }
> bio_put(bio);
> @@ -702,11 +705,14 @@ submit_page_section(struct dio *dio, struct page *page,
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> + lock_page(page);
> +
> if (dio->rw & WRITE) {
> /*
> * Read accounting is performed in submit_bio()
> */
> task_io_account_write(len);
> + set_page_writeback(page);
> }
>
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/