From: Julia Lawall on
From: Julia Lawall <julia(a)diku.dk>

Use ERR_CAST(x) rather than ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(x)). The former makes more
clear what is the purpose of the operation, which otherwise looks like a
no-op.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
type T;
T x;
identifier f;
@@

T f (...) { <+...
- ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(x))
+ x
...+> }

@@
expression x;
@@

- ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(x))
+ ERR_CAST(x)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia(a)diku.dk>

---
fs/affs/namei.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -u -p a/fs/affs/namei.c b/fs/affs/namei.c
--- a/fs/affs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/affs/namei.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ affs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct de
affs_brelse(bh);
inode = affs_iget(sb, ino);
if (IS_ERR(inode))
- return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(inode));
+ return ERR_CAST(inode);
}
dentry->d_op = AFFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & SF_INTL ? &affs_intl_dentry_operations : &affs_dentry_operations;
d_add(dentry, inode);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/