From: Colin Ian King on
Ensure additions on touch_ts do not overflow. This can occur when
the top 32 bits of the TSC reach 0xffffffff causing additions to
touch_ts to overflow and this in turn generates spurious softlockup
warnings.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
---
kernel/softlockup.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softlockup.c b/kernel/softlockup.c
index 0d4c789..90d9aa0 100644
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ int proc_dosoftlockup_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void softlockup_tick(void)
{
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- unsigned long touch_ts = per_cpu(softlockup_touch_ts, this_cpu);
+ unsigned long long touch_ts = per_cpu(softlockup_touch_ts, this_cpu);
unsigned long print_ts;
struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
- unsigned long now;
+ unsigned long long now;

/* Is detection switched off? */
if (!per_cpu(softlockup_watchdog, this_cpu) || softlockup_thresh <= 0) {
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
per_cpu(softlockup_print_ts, this_cpu) = touch_ts;

spin_lock(&print_lock);
- printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#%d stuck for %lus! [%s:%d]\n",
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#%d stuck for %llus! [%s:%d]\n",
this_cpu, now - touch_ts,
current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
print_modules();
--
1.6.3.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/