From: Eeyore on


Phildo wrote:

> Despite me reposting this several times Arnold I have still to get a reply
> from you.

Trying to create trouble and superfluous posts clogging the group up as usual Phildo ?

Good for Arny for ignoring you.

Graham

From: Arny Krueger on
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:48679DDF.5E8A033A(a)hotmail.com
> Phildo wrote:
>
>> Despite me reposting this several times Arnold I have
>> still to get a reply from you.
>
> Trying to create trouble and superfluous posts clogging
> the group up as usual Phildo ?

> Good for Arny for ignoring you.

The irony - at the very moment Phildo posted it, I was doing live sound for
a rehearsal at church. ;-)


From: Eeyore on


Phildo wrote:

> "Arny Krueger" wrote
> > "Eeyore" wrote:
> >> Phildo wrote:
> >>
> >>> Despite me reposting this several times Arnold I have
> >>> still to get a reply from you.
> >>
> >> Trying to create trouble and superfluous posts clogging
> >> the group up as usual Phildo ?
>
> I see Graham still hasn't gained the intelligence to grasp the simple
> concept of killfiling and is still addressing posts to me thinking I can see
> them.

I see you haven't yet grasped the simple concept of not replying to my posts. That's what a 'killfile' is supposed to be for.

I'll leave the smarter bods in AAPL-S to work that one out.

Graham

From: liquidator on

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48695DC0.6D32CAEA(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
> Phildo wrote:
>
> > "Arny Krueger" wrote
> > > "Eeyore" wrote:
> > >> Phildo wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Despite me reposting this several times Arnold I have
> > >>> still to get a reply from you.
> > >>
> > >> Trying to create trouble and superfluous posts clogging
> > >> the group up as usual Phildo ?
> >
> > I see Graham still hasn't gained the intelligence to grasp the simple
> > concept of killfiling and is still addressing posts to me thinking I can
see
> > them.
>
> I see you haven't yet grasped the simple concept of not replying to my
posts. That's what a 'killfile' is supposed to be for.
>
> I'll leave the smarter bods in AAPL-S to work that one out.
>
> Graham
>

Not sure what you are saying- in this case he is obviously replying to Arny.


From: Phildo on

"liquidator" <mikeh(a)mad.scientist.com> wrote in message
news:g4c1f2$on1$1(a)aioe.org...
>
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:48695DC0.6D32CAEA(a)hotmail.com...
>>
>>
>> Phildo wrote:
>>
>> > "Arny Krueger" wrote
>> > > "Eeyore" wrote:
>> > >> Phildo wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Despite me reposting this several times Arnold I have
>> > >>> still to get a reply from you.
>> > >>
>> > >> Trying to create trouble and superfluous posts clogging
>> > >> the group up as usual Phildo ?
>> >
>> > I see Graham still hasn't gained the intelligence to grasp the simple
>> > concept of killfiling and is still addressing posts to me thinking I
>> > can
> see
>> > them.
>>
>> I see you haven't yet grasped the simple concept of not replying to my
> posts. That's what a 'killfile' is supposed to be for.
>>
>> I'll leave the smarter bods in AAPL-S to work that one out.
>>
>> Graham
>>
>
> Not sure what you are saying- in this case he is obviously replying to
> Arny.

As I already said, Graham lacks the intelligence to understand how a
killfile works.

I tell you what Graham - if you can find a single example of me replying
directly to one of your posts since you went in my killfile I will leave
this newsgroup and never come back. Of course if you can't then you do the
same. Are you enough of a man to back up your words or are you just a
coward?

Phildo