|
From: SMS on 17 Apr 2008 08:40 I'm changing ISPs from one that includes VPN service with every account, to one that doesn't, because the savings are substantial. Since I often use Wi-Fi "out in the wild" I need to replace this VPN service with something. Has anyone used J-Wire's Hotspot Helper ("http://www.jiwire.com/hotspot-helper.htm") or HotSpot VPN ("http://www.hotspotvpn.com/"). J-Wire is $25/year, while HotSpot VPN is $88 per year. I'm not clear on the advantage, if any, of the more expensive service.
From: Jeff Liebermann on 17 Apr 2008 12:41 On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:40:13 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote: >I'm changing ISPs from one that includes VPN service with every account, >to one that doesn't, because the savings are substantial. > >Since I often use Wi-Fi "out in the wild" I need to replace this VPN >service with something. > >Has anyone used J-Wire's Hotspot Helper >("http://www.jiwire.com/hotspot-helper.htm") or HotSpot VPN >("http://www.hotspotvpn.com/"). > >J-Wire is $25/year, while HotSpot VPN is $88 per year. I'm not clear on >the advantage, if any, of the more expensive service. Sonic runs IPSec which is about as good as it gets. If you can live with PPTP or an SSL VPN, you can terminate the VPN with any commodity router that supports PPTP or SSL VPN's, or a Linux server, or even a Windoze 2000/2003 server. The catch is that the box or server has to be sitting on a fat pipe, which usually means sitting in the ISP's server farm. I roll my own which terminates at a friends router that's sitting in a server farm. It's fairly fast. I also have PPTP VPN terminations setup on my office and home routers. With DSL lines, it's *REALLY* slow. I use these only for checking if I have any email or testing. There are some other VPN terminations. See the FAQ: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi#VPN_Service_Providers> One that looks interesting is iPig: <http://www.iopus.com/iPig/> which offers a free VPN server (iPig Server Express Edition): <http://www.iopus.com/iPig/download/> I haven't tried it, but if you have a Windoze box running somewhere, it might be an easy solution. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl(a)cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
From: Bill Kearney on 17 Apr 2008 12:47 > I also have PPTP VPN terminations > setup on my office and home routers. With DSL lines, it's *REALLY* > slow. I use these only for checking if I have any email or testing. I've had VPN's setup at home for quite a while. I would not call it "really slow". It's as fast as your uplink speed. I've had a 1.5/512 connection for a while and it's certainly faster than a 768/128. One other alternative to VPN is to use a remote desktop session. This way you connect to your home PC as a video client. RDP takes about 20k per session, more than usable over a 128k link. You can't watch full motion video through it but it's good for nearly everything else. If you don't want to use RDP you could use VNC instead. There's lots of ways to make it work. The single biggest hassle to using your own home connection is the dynamic IP address. Sign up for a dynamic DNS service and set it up on your router. I'll work well enough most of the time. -Bill Kearney
From: Jeff Liebermann on 17 Apr 2008 13:57 On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:47:55 -0400, "Bill Kearney" <wkearney99(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> I also have PPTP VPN terminations >> setup on my office and home routers. With DSL lines, it's *REALLY* >> slow. I use these only for checking if I have any email or testing. > >I've had VPN's setup at home for quite a while. I would not call it "really >slow". It's as fast as your uplink speed. I've had a 1.5/512 connection >for a while and it's certainly faster than a 768/128. I'm on 3.0/256 in the office and 1.5/256 at home. Those speeds work fine for everything except the automagic updates that Microsloth and every other vendor insists on dumping on one's machine without asking. I have to turn off all that stuff on my laptop in order to use my laptop effectively through a slow connection. If I don't use my laptop for perhaps a week, I'm guaranteed a few megabloats of downloads before I can start using the laptop. Meanwhile, I've been experimenting with splitting the traffic on the laptop. The email traffic goes to my home router VPN which I treat as a proxy server. Everything else goes through the gateway on the coffee shop wireless router. I haven't been in one place with my laptop long enough to set it up correctly, or be sure it's working, but it seems like a reasonable compromise. >One other alternative to VPN is to use a remote desktop session. This way >you connect to your home PC as a video client. RDP takes about 20k per >session, more than usable over a 128k link. You can't watch full motion >video through it but it's good for nearly everything else. If you don't >want to use RDP you could use VNC instead. There's lots of ways to make it >work. I use RealVNC extensively. Works well but is slow. So is MS Remote Desktop, GoToMyPC, and PC Anywhere. What's odd is that they are slow at different things. Each one seems to optimize some part of the puzzle, at the expense of others. Weird. >The single biggest hassle to using your own home connection is the dynamic >IP address. Sign up for a dynamic DNS service and set it up on your router. >I'll work well enough most of the time. I've been using DynDNS for years. I think I'm up to about 30 machines. No problems except compatibility issues with broken built in DynDNS clients found in some routers. <http://www.dyndns.com/support/clients/hardware/> -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl(a)cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
From: msg on 18 Apr 2008 11:03 Jeff Liebermann wrote: <snip> > I roll my own which terminates at a friends router that's sitting in a > server farm. It's fairly fast. I also have PPTP VPN terminations > setup on my office and home routers. With DSL lines, it's *REALLY* > slow. I use these only for checking if I have any email or testing. In my experience, IPsec (native on OpenBSD, USAGI on linux) with 'isapkmpd' key management has been a good solution. The free 'Secure Sentinel SSH' Ipsec VPN client for Windows performs well, and over slower connections is quite tolerable. No need to co-locate your VPN endpoint at the ISP for small-scale applications. Costs only your time to implement (on DSL and WiFi) and can save the O.P. a lot of moolah in the long term. Regards, Michael
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: linux router connecting to dd-wrt(s) for VPN Next: WISP Routing into house WiFi network |