From: Norm75 on
I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other day, I
changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and the
wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that I had
placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge, that is
all I did.

I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two named
pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable. Before
the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She hadn't
visited the wedding page.

I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I have
checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done with
the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't see any
difference at all.

If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with
firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE.

Many thanks. Norm.
From: Rob Giordano (Crash) on
look at the head and body tags on that page you should have one set of each
and they should be opened and closed properly

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rob Giordano
Microsoft MVP Expression






"Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:314B676C-95E2-419D-B0DA-4D975CF952E4(a)microsoft.com...
> I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other
> day, I
> changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and the
> wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that I
> had
> placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge, that
> is
> all I did.
>
> I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two
> named
> pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable.
> Before
> the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She hadn't
> visited the wedding page.
>
> I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I have
> checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done
> with
> the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't see
> any
> difference at all.
>
> If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with
> firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE.
>
> Many thanks. Norm.


From: Norm75 on
Thanks Rob. Actually I have the head and body tags on the page. With my
deleting the tables on each of the page, could that action interfere with the
page layout when using FF?

Norm.

"Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote:

> look at the head and body tags on that page you should have one set of each
> and they should be opened and closed properly
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Rob Giordano
> Microsoft MVP Expression
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:314B676C-95E2-419D-B0DA-4D975CF952E4(a)microsoft.com...
> > I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other
> > day, I
> > changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and the
> > wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that I
> > had
> > placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge, that
> > is
> > all I did.
> >
> > I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two
> > named
> > pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable.
> > Before
> > the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She hadn't
> > visited the wedding page.
> >
> > I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I have
> > checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done
> > with
> > the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't see
> > any
> > difference at all.
> >
> > If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with
> > firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE.
> >
> > Many thanks. Norm.
>
>
From: Murray on
Your page contains a large dollop of invalid code - the validator finds 156
errors.

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.telus.net%2Fwpguc%2F

This snippet illustrates what Rob was trying to point out, I believe -

</head>

<!-- THREE STEPS TO INSTALL JS SLIDESHOW SCRIPT II:



1. Copy the coding into the HEAD of your HTML document

2. Add the onLoad event handler into the BODY tag

3. Put the last coding into the BODY of your HTML document -->



<!-- STEP ONE: Paste this code into the HEAD of your HTML document -->



<HEAD>

Note that the </head> tag is followed by a second <head>, and that's
incorrect. Later on you have this -

<body>
<BODY onLoad="runSlideShow()">

again, incorrect.

Fix those errors (yes, all 156 of them) before worrying about page
funtionality.

Many of those errors are caused by a mismatch between the XHTML strict
doctype on the page (you would be better off replacing it with an HTML4.01
Transitional one -

by changing this -

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en">

to this -

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>


--
Murray
MVP Expression Web


"Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3A897D0D-9DBF-43C8-BD06-ACC14AC6DD5A(a)microsoft.com...
> Thanks Rob. Actually I have the head and body tags on the page. With my
> deleting the tables on each of the page, could that action interfere with
> the
> page layout when using FF?
>
> Norm.
>
> "Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote:
>
>> look at the head and body tags on that page you should have one set of
>> each
>> and they should be opened and closed properly
>>
>> --
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Rob Giordano
>> Microsoft MVP Expression
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:314B676C-95E2-419D-B0DA-4D975CF952E4(a)microsoft.com...
>> > I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other
>> > day, I
>> > changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and
>> > the
>> > wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that
>> > I
>> > had
>> > placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge,
>> > that
>> > is
>> > all I did.
>> >
>> > I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two
>> > named
>> > pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable.
>> > Before
>> > the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She
>> > hadn't
>> > visited the wedding page.
>> >
>> > I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I
>> > have
>> > checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done
>> > with
>> > the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't
>> > see
>> > any
>> > difference at all.
>> >
>> > If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with
>> > firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE.
>> >
>> > Many thanks. Norm.
>>
>>

From: Norm75 on
Thanks, Murray for your guidance. I'm a real neophite with coding but will
have a go and see how I make out.

Thanks again. Norm.

"Murray" wrote:

> Your page contains a large dollop of invalid code - the validator finds 156
> errors.
>
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.telus.net%2Fwpguc%2F
>
> This snippet illustrates what Rob was trying to point out, I believe -
>
> </head>
>
> <!-- THREE STEPS TO INSTALL JS SLIDESHOW SCRIPT II:
>
>
>
> 1. Copy the coding into the HEAD of your HTML document
>
> 2. Add the onLoad event handler into the BODY tag
>
> 3. Put the last coding into the BODY of your HTML document -->
>
>
>
> <!-- STEP ONE: Paste this code into the HEAD of your HTML document -->
>
>
>
> <HEAD>
>
> Note that the </head> tag is followed by a second <head>, and that's
> incorrect. Later on you have this -
>
> <body>
> <BODY onLoad="runSlideShow()">
>
> again, incorrect.
>
> Fix those errors (yes, all 156 of them) before worrying about page
> funtionality.
>
> Many of those errors are caused by a mismatch between the XHTML strict
> doctype on the page (you would be better off replacing it with an HTML4.01
> Transitional one -
>
> by changing this -
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en">
>
> to this -
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
> <html>
>
>
> --
> Murray
> MVP Expression Web
>
>
> "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3A897D0D-9DBF-43C8-BD06-ACC14AC6DD5A(a)microsoft.com...
> > Thanks Rob. Actually I have the head and body tags on the page. With my
> > deleting the tables on each of the page, could that action interfere with
> > the
> > page layout when using FF?
> >
> > Norm.
> >
> > "Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote:
> >
> >> look at the head and body tags on that page you should have one set of
> >> each
> >> and they should be opened and closed properly
> >>
> >> --
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> Rob Giordano
> >> Microsoft MVP Expression
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:314B676C-95E2-419D-B0DA-4D975CF952E4(a)microsoft.com...
> >> > I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other
> >> > day, I
> >> > changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and
> >> > the
> >> > wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that
> >> > I
> >> > had
> >> > placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge,
> >> > that
> >> > is
> >> > all I did.
> >> >
> >> > I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two
> >> > named
> >> > pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable.
> >> > Before
> >> > the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She
> >> > hadn't
> >> > visited the wedding page.
> >> >
> >> > I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I
> >> > have
> >> > checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done
> >> > with
> >> > the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't
> >> > see
> >> > any
> >> > difference at all.
> >> >
> >> > If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with
> >> > firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE.
> >> >
> >> > Many thanks. Norm.
> >>
> >>
>