|
Prev: I am trying to understand this code...
Next: Problem rendering page with Firefox 3 and Safari browsers
From: Norm75 on 26 Jul 2008 19:34 I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other day, I changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and the wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that I had placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge, that is all I did. I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two named pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable. Before the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She hadn't visited the wedding page. I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I have checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done with the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't see any difference at all. If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE. Many thanks. Norm.
From: Rob Giordano (Crash) on 26 Jul 2008 22:44 look at the head and body tags on that page you should have one set of each and they should be opened and closed properly -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rob Giordano Microsoft MVP Expression "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:314B676C-95E2-419D-B0DA-4D975CF952E4(a)microsoft.com... > I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other > day, I > changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and the > wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that I > had > placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge, that > is > all I did. > > I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two > named > pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable. > Before > the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She hadn't > visited the wedding page. > > I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I have > checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done > with > the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't see > any > difference at all. > > If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with > firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE. > > Many thanks. Norm.
From: Norm75 on 26 Jul 2008 23:27 Thanks Rob. Actually I have the head and body tags on the page. With my deleting the tables on each of the page, could that action interfere with the page layout when using FF? Norm. "Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote: > look at the head and body tags on that page you should have one set of each > and they should be opened and closed properly > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Rob Giordano > Microsoft MVP Expression > > > > > > > "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:314B676C-95E2-419D-B0DA-4D975CF952E4(a)microsoft.com... > > I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other > > day, I > > changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and the > > wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that I > > had > > placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge, that > > is > > all I did. > > > > I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two > > named > > pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable. > > Before > > the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She hadn't > > visited the wedding page. > > > > I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I have > > checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done > > with > > the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't see > > any > > difference at all. > > > > If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with > > firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE. > > > > Many thanks. Norm. > >
From: Murray on 27 Jul 2008 07:41 Your page contains a large dollop of invalid code - the validator finds 156 errors. http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.telus.net%2Fwpguc%2F This snippet illustrates what Rob was trying to point out, I believe - </head> <!-- THREE STEPS TO INSTALL JS SLIDESHOW SCRIPT II: 1. Copy the coding into the HEAD of your HTML document 2. Add the onLoad event handler into the BODY tag 3. Put the last coding into the BODY of your HTML document --> <!-- STEP ONE: Paste this code into the HEAD of your HTML document --> <HEAD> Note that the </head> tag is followed by a second <head>, and that's incorrect. Later on you have this - <body> <BODY onLoad="runSlideShow()"> again, incorrect. Fix those errors (yes, all 156 of them) before worrying about page funtionality. Many of those errors are caused by a mismatch between the XHTML strict doctype on the page (you would be better off replacing it with an HTML4.01 Transitional one - by changing this - <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"> to this - <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> <html> -- Murray MVP Expression Web "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:3A897D0D-9DBF-43C8-BD06-ACC14AC6DD5A(a)microsoft.com... > Thanks Rob. Actually I have the head and body tags on the page. With my > deleting the tables on each of the page, could that action interfere with > the > page layout when using FF? > > Norm. > > "Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote: > >> look at the head and body tags on that page you should have one set of >> each >> and they should be opened and closed properly >> >> -- >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> Rob Giordano >> Microsoft MVP Expression >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:314B676C-95E2-419D-B0DA-4D975CF952E4(a)microsoft.com... >> > I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other >> > day, I >> > changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and >> > the >> > wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that >> > I >> > had >> > placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge, >> > that >> > is >> > all I did. >> > >> > I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two >> > named >> > pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable. >> > Before >> > the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She >> > hadn't >> > visited the wedding page. >> > >> > I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I >> > have >> > checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done >> > with >> > the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't >> > see >> > any >> > difference at all. >> > >> > If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with >> > firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE. >> > >> > Many thanks. Norm. >> >>
From: Norm75 on 27 Jul 2008 09:25 Thanks, Murray for your guidance. I'm a real neophite with coding but will have a go and see how I make out. Thanks again. Norm. "Murray" wrote: > Your page contains a large dollop of invalid code - the validator finds 156 > errors. > > http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.telus.net%2Fwpguc%2F > > This snippet illustrates what Rob was trying to point out, I believe - > > </head> > > <!-- THREE STEPS TO INSTALL JS SLIDESHOW SCRIPT II: > > > > 1. Copy the coding into the HEAD of your HTML document > > 2. Add the onLoad event handler into the BODY tag > > 3. Put the last coding into the BODY of your HTML document --> > > > > <!-- STEP ONE: Paste this code into the HEAD of your HTML document --> > > > > <HEAD> > > Note that the </head> tag is followed by a second <head>, and that's > incorrect. Later on you have this - > > <body> > <BODY onLoad="runSlideShow()"> > > again, incorrect. > > Fix those errors (yes, all 156 of them) before worrying about page > funtionality. > > Many of those errors are caused by a mismatch between the XHTML strict > doctype on the page (you would be better off replacing it with an HTML4.01 > Transitional one - > > by changing this - > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"> > > to this - > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> > <html> > > > -- > Murray > MVP Expression Web > > > "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:3A897D0D-9DBF-43C8-BD06-ACC14AC6DD5A(a)microsoft.com... > > Thanks Rob. Actually I have the head and body tags on the page. With my > > deleting the tables on each of the page, could that action interfere with > > the > > page layout when using FF? > > > > Norm. > > > > "Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote: > > > >> look at the head and body tags on that page you should have one set of > >> each > >> and they should be opened and closed properly > >> > >> -- > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> Rob Giordano > >> Microsoft MVP Expression > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> "Norm75" <Norm75(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:314B676C-95E2-419D-B0DA-4D975CF952E4(a)microsoft.com... > >> > I have a small website - www.wpguc.com - our church website. The other > >> > day, I > >> > changed pictures on the "slideshow" part of the couples' club page and > >> > the > >> > wedding page. When I did that, I also deleted a number of pictures that > >> > I > >> > had > >> > placed earlier in a table format (not a slideshow). To my knowledge, > >> > that > >> > is > >> > all I did. > >> > > >> > I learned from one of my viewers, that using firefox browser, the two > >> > named > >> > pages ceased to function - the images were scrambled and not viewable. > >> > Before > >> > the change, she reported that the couples club page was fine. She > >> > hadn't > >> > visited the wedding page. > >> > > >> > I installed firefox in my computer and she was certainly correct. I > >> > have > >> > checked the HTML code against a backup copy (not FTP to the site) done > >> > with > >> > the slideshow and tables containing the static pictures, and I can't > >> > see > >> > any > >> > difference at all. > >> > > >> > If someone could give me a hand to clarify why this is happening with > >> > firefox, it would be most appreciated. Works fine with IE. > >> > > >> > Many thanks. Norm. > >> > >> >
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: I am trying to understand this code... Next: Problem rendering page with Firefox 3 and Safari browsers |