|
From: Chris Davies on 4 May 2008 10:09 In comp.os.linux.misc Goran Ivanic <goran(a)lycos.com> wrote: > Assume I want to transfer large amounts of stuff from one server to > another (through Internet). Either you do or you don't. It's hard enough understanding people's questions without having unnecessary assumptions thrown about. > Which method should I prefer: > ftp or rsync ? Your preference is entirely up to you. Personally, if it really was "large amounts of stuff", I'd consider sending a tape through the post. > What are the Pros and Cons? > Which is faster? > Which is more stable? I think you probably ought to go and do your own homework, don't you? Chris
From: Moody on 5 May 2008 07:58 On May 4, 7:09 pm, Chris Davies <chris-use...(a)roaima.co.uk> wrote: > In comp.os.linux.misc Goran Ivanic <go...(a)lycos.com> wrote: > > > Assume I want to transfer large amounts of stuff from one server to > > another (through Internet). > > Either you do or you don't. It's hard enough understanding people's > questions without having unnecessary assumptions thrown about. > > > Which method should I prefer: > > ftp or rsync ? > I would rather go for rsync, it gives you a lot more functionality over ftp,,,you may customize and do stuff like files to retain or not... > Your preference is entirely up to you. Personally, if it really was > "large amounts of stuff", I'd consider sending a tape through the post. > > > What are the Pros and Cons? > > Which is faster? > > Which is more stable? > > I think you probably ought to go and do your own homework, don't you? > Chris
From: Guillaume Dargaud on 5 May 2008 11:49 There's really no reason to prefer ftp over rsync, except maybe that most browser have ftp support but not always rsync. If you are going to have many simultaneous transfers, you may not want to do it over ssh as it will be too CPU intensive over a fat pipe. -- Guillaume Dargaud http://www.gdargaud.net/Antarctica/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Cygwin script issue Next: Execute commands remotely and get its result |