|
Prev: Disabling the shadow in screen grabs
Next: Apple Products [Was Re: [iPhone] 1 million iPhone 3G and 10 million apps sold since Friday]
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on 15 Jul 2008 03:01 Is there any way to change the priority ('nice' it, in Unix terms) of a running application? I'm doing a lot of manual archiv/zipping at the moment, and it'd be great if I could set the bloody things to low priority so they don't take over my computer - it's only a mini so it's a bit disk bound. Cheers - Jaimie -- Far away is close at hand in images of elsewhere
From: Ian McCall on 15 Jul 2008 03:11 On 2008-07-15 08:01:28 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> said: > Is there any way to change the priority ('nice' it, in Unix terms) of > a running application? Not used it, but is this any use? <http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/13336> There are some freebie ones as well, but they all seem to want to renice an existing process, not maintain priority lists for eg. making sure zip runs with low priority. Cheers, Ian
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on 15 Jul 2008 03:53 On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:11:03 +0100, Ian McCall <ian(a)eruvia.org> wrote: >On 2008-07-15 08:01:28 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh ><jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> said: > >> Is there any way to change the priority ('nice' it, in Unix terms) of >> a running application? > >Not used it, but is this any use? > ><http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/13336> > >There are some freebie ones as well, but they all seem to want to >renice an existing process, not maintain priority lists for eg. making >sure zip runs with low priority. That seems pretty effective, ta. Not sure why my own hunts didn't track this one down! Poor choice of search terms, I guess. Cheers - Jaimie -- Isn't it funny how much mature wisdom resembles being too tired to bother?
From: zoara on 15 Jul 2008 16:47 Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> wrote: > Is there any way to change the priority ('nice' it, in Unix terms) of > a running application? > > I'm doing a lot of manual archiv/zipping at the moment, and it'd be > great if I could set the bloody things to low priority so they don't > take over my computer - it's only a mini so it's a bit disk bound. Similarly, I'd like to be able to restrict an application to using an arbitrary percentage of CPU power. Even if nothing else is happening, I want some apps to each use a max of only (say) 50% of one core. I suspect that this isn't actually possible, though. -z- -- am forget my password of mac,did you give me password on new email marko.[redacted]@yahoo.com
From: Isaac J. on 17 Jul 2008 11:50
zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> wrote: > > > Is there any way to change the priority ('nice' it, in Unix terms) of > > a running application? > > > > I'm doing a lot of manual archiv/zipping at the moment, and it'd be > > great if I could set the bloody things to low priority so they don't > > take over my computer - it's only a mini so it's a bit disk bound. > > Similarly, I'd like to be able to restrict an application to using an > arbitrary percentage of CPU power. Even if nothing else is happening, I > want some apps to each use a max of only (say) 50% of one core. > > I suspect that this isn't actually possible, though. Not under OS X. nice doesn't do that. Some variants of fair share scheduling algorithms allow for it. |