From: Gareth Magennis on
http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/sites/r/rugby_radio/index.shtml



An interesting history of the Rugby Radio Station, which I often pass, and
used to wonder what it was, on the M1 Motorway. (between junctions 18 and
19)

Seems that during the war, 16Khz and 18.75Khz were the preferred
transmitting frequencies.



Kind of blurs the distinction between audio and RF, eh what.



Gareth.


From: bob on
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:18:23 GMT, "Gareth Magennis"
<gareth.magennis(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:

>http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/sites/r/rugby_radio/index.shtml
>
>
>
>An interesting history of the Rugby Radio Station, which I often pass, and
>used to wonder what it was, on the M1 Motorway. (between junctions 18 and
>19)
>
>Seems that during the war, 16Khz and 18.75Khz were the preferred
>transmitting frequencies.
>
>
>
>Kind of blurs the distinction between audio and RF, eh what.
>
>
>
>Gareth.
>

It made for really long whips on your car...

From: Tim Perry on

"Gareth Magennis" <gareth.magennis(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:3Hbdk.24020$E41.11086(a)text.news.virginmedia.com...
> http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/sites/r/rugby_radio/index.shtml
>
>
>
> An interesting history of the Rugby Radio Station, which I often pass, and
> used to wonder what it was, on the M1 Motorway. (between junctions 18 and
> 19)
>
> Seems that during the war, 16Khz and 18.75Khz were the preferred
> transmitting frequencies.
>

I think you misread.... thats 18.75 meters (the wavelength) 300/18.75 = 16
MHz (shortwave aka HF)

>
>
> Kind of blurs the distinction between audio and RF, eh what.

If you can hear it, its audio. If you can dance to it, its music.

>
>
>
> Gareth.
>
>


From: Phil Allison on

"Tim Perry"

>
>> Seems that during the war, 16Khz and 18.75Khz were the preferred
>> transmitting frequencies.
>>
>
> I think you misread.... thats 18.75 meters (the wavelength) 300/18.75 =
> 16
> MHz (shortwave aka HF)


** No - the frequency is 16kHz or 18.75 km wavelength.

With huge power ( and a massive antenna system) it would cover the planet
( Morse only) day or night.

Hard to jam too.

Has zero relation to audio.



....... Phil




From: Gareth Magennis on

"Phil Allison" <philallison(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:6dlgrrF37cujU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Tim Perry"
>
>>
>>> Seems that during the war, 16Khz and 18.75Khz were the preferred
>>> transmitting frequencies.
>>>
>>
>> I think you misread.... thats 18.75 meters (the wavelength) 300/18.75 =
>> 16
>> MHz (shortwave aka HF)
>
>
> ** No - the frequency is 16kHz or 18.75 km wavelength.
>
> With huge power ( and a massive antenna system) it would cover the planet
> ( Morse only) day or night.
>
> Hard to jam too.
>
> Has zero relation to audio.
>
>
>
> ...... Phil
>


Here's something that does though.
http://www.canford.co.uk/ProductResources/ig/2636.pdf

These clocks use the signal from the Rugby transmitter to ensure accuracy,
commonly used in Broadcast, so I believe. No excuse for missing your cues
then.



Gareth.


 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: In-Ear Monitoring
Next: To bridge or not to bridge ?