Rapport from installation of Ubuntu 7.10 on amd64
in [ASM]
|
From: Herbert Kleebauer on 1 Feb 2008 04:12 Evenbit wrote: > He might try to see if this works in Wine: > http://www.flos-freeware.ch/notepad2.html And can you also use the notepad clone to surf in the Internet like you can do with the original? (Open the help window in notepad, right click on the on the title bar and select "goto URL").
From: //o//annabee "Ubuntu for on 1 Feb 2008 06:18 P� Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:08:09 +0100, skrev Herbert Kleebauer <klee(a)unibwm.de>: > //\\\\o//\\\\annabee wrote: > >> Only drawback is I now have to start using NASM for coding. > > You don't have to use NASM for coding. In opposite to Windows, > Linux comes with a pre installed C compiler. Who would use a bike > if he get a Porsche for free. > And if you really need to drive to > a location which can't be reached with the Porsche, then there > is always GAS in the trunk. > And GAS has a much better syntax than > any of the existing Intel like assemblers. Useless for coding anything more then a routine now and then. Cannot code a complete app in that thing. What you __confess__ to btw, when you say you prefer C. Cannot become one with that syntax and be creative. You are just provoking, because you know damn well that RosAsm is the only assembler worthy coding apps with. :) >> I see no longer any reason to use windows. > > Then put your eyeglasses on. You don't "use" the OS. The OS > is needed to execute your applications. So, which OS you use > depends for what OS the application you want to use is > written. And in most cases this is Windows. I use an OS for the fun of it, for reading documents, for experimenting with technology and for learning, for watching movies, listening to music, audio and video podcasts, and audiobooks. And for chatting and searching the web. This is also what 90% of user do. So they do not need windows anymore, either. Because all of this is available for free in Linux, and the one disto I have does this many times more efficient then windows. But it costs and arm and a leg if you do it with windows. Ubuntu is free, and it promises to remain free. And the speed it is evolving at is terrific. By the end of this decade, even Bill Gates will prefer Linux. :)
From: Spam Killer on 1 Feb 2008 06:44 On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:08:09 +0100, Herbert Kleebauer wrote: > >You don't have to use NASM for coding. In opposite to Windows, >Linux comes with a pre installed C compiler. Who would use a bike >if he get a Porsche for free. > It is pretty obvious, that you come to this conclusion just because you limit yourself to the use of windela only, and don't even look at what is available for assembly. Yes if everyone would *have to* use windela, they would use the "Volkswagen" C (a much better comparison), and not the Ferrari Assembly, or more likely would write their own Assemblers. I don't know what IDEs are available for Linux, but in Windows those who do use Assembly, either use RosAsm with its integrated IDE, or RadAsm which is a great IDE configurable for all Assemblers around, where you can add Menus, Dialog Boxes or any other Resource very easily to your Assembly project, and nicely manage your source files. If you'd bother to take a look at RadAsm, you would not make that absurd statement again! With such a Programming environment, who would use a Volkswagen when he gets a Ferrari for free! -- wfz
From: Herbert Kleebauer on 1 Feb 2008 09:09 Spam Killer wrote: > If you'd bother to take a look at RadAsm, you would not make that > absurd statement again! > > With such a Programming environment, who would use a Volkswagen when > he gets a Ferrari for free! To say it with Betov's words: show me your applications written in assembly!
From: Greg on 1 Feb 2008 10:59
i also got a free copy of Ubuntu 7 , i have not installed it though, i am still looking for a good virtual software so that i can have windows and linux on one machine sooner |