Prev: Odd json encoding erro
Next: Subclassing RegexObject
From: Aahz on 2 Jan 2010 01:56 In article <7p2juvFu8tU1(a)mid.individual.net>, Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing(a)canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: >MRAB wrote: >> >> In simple cases you might be replacing with the same string every time, >> but other cases you might want the replacement to contain substrings >> captured by the regex. > >But you can give it a function that has access to the match object and >can produce whatever replacement string it wants. Assuming I remember correctly, the function capability came after the replacement capability. I think that breaking replacement would be a Bad Idea. -- Aahz (aahz(a)pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ Weinberg's Second Law: If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization. |