From: Aahz on
In article <7p2juvFu8tU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing(a)canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>MRAB wrote:
>>
>> In simple cases you might be replacing with the same string every time,
>> but other cases you might want the replacement to contain substrings
>> captured by the regex.
>
>But you can give it a function that has access to the match object and
>can produce whatever replacement string it wants.

Assuming I remember correctly, the function capability came after the
replacement capability. I think that breaking replacement would be a
Bad Idea.
--
Aahz (aahz(a)pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

Weinberg's Second Law: If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote
programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Odd json encoding erro
Next: Subclassing RegexObject