From: robert bristow-johnson on
On May 6, 3:18 am, rajesh <getrajes...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Is anyone interested in re-engineering Matlab?

computing the FFT and getting tired of seeing your DC value in bin #1?

don't fight it, just give into it. MATLAB is right despite what your
textbook says. the frequency of DC is 1. and don't ever forget it.

r b-j
From: Steve Underwood on
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> On May 6, 3:18 am, rajesh <getrajes...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is anyone interested in re-engineering Matlab?
>
> computing the FFT and getting tired of seeing your DC value in bin #1?
>
> don't fight it, just give into it. MATLAB is right despite what your
> textbook says. the frequency of DC is 1. and don't ever forget it.
>
> r b-j

Matlab - put it in the bin, where it belongs :-)

Steve
From: helper on
>
> Matlab - put it in the bin, where it belongs :-)
>
> Steve

<- Taking MATLAB out of bin and placing Steve's post there.
From: rajesh on
On May 7, 5:05 am, Steve Underwood <ste...(a)dis.org> wrote:
> robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> > On May 6, 3:18 am, rajesh <getrajes...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is anyone interested in re-engineering Matlab?
>
> > computing the FFT and getting tired of seeing your DC value in bin #1?
>
> > don't fight it, just give into it. MATLAB is right despite what your
> > textbook says. the frequency of DC is 1. and don't ever forget it.
>
> > r b-j
>
> Matlab - put it in the bin, where it belongs :-)
>
> Steve

Which programming language/tool is best for research and development.
I have used Analog Devices CROSSCORE DSP tolols and found them to be
excellent for development.
they even do have means to plot a signal or view a image from memory
contents.