Prev: Problems with IQMath library
Next: Hardware Required
From: rajesh on 6 May 2008 03:18

Is anyone interested in re-engineering Matlab?
From: Manolis C. Tsakiris on 6 May 2008 05:42
>
> Is anyone interested in re-engineering Matlab?
>

Hi,

may i forecast an explosion of answers, not necessarily positive ones?

Manolis
From: Andor on 6 May 2008 07:59
Manolis C. Tsakiris wrote:
> >  Is anyone interested in re-engineering Matlab?
>
> Hi,
>
> may i forecast an explosion of answers, not necessarily positive ones?
>
> Manolis

I'm not sure about your forecast. Matlab has already been re-
engineered at least partly, see all the free clones. It would be more
interesting to focus all the re-engineering activity to one particular
clone ...

From: rajesh on 7 May 2008 01:13
On May 7, 5:05 am, Steve Underwood <ste...(a)dis.org> wrote:
> robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> > On May 6, 3:18 am, rajesh <getrajes...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is anyone interested in re-engineering Matlab?
>
> > computing the FFT and getting tired of seeing your DC value in bin #1?
>
> > don't fight it, just give into it. MATLAB is right despite what your
> > textbook says. the frequency of DC is 1. and don't ever forget it.
>
> > r b-j
>
> Matlab - put it in the bin, where it belongs :-)
>
> Steve

Which programming language/tool is best for research and development.
I have used Analog Devices CROSSCORE DSP tolols and found them to be
excellent for development.
they even do have means to plot a signal or view a image from memory
contents.

From: Rick Lyons on 7 May 2008 06:07
On Tue, 6 May 2008 00:18:21 -0700 (PDT), rajesh
<getrajeshin(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Is anyone interested in re-engineering Matlab?

Hi,
I know one guy who would be interested:
Robert Bristow-Johnson.

[-Rick-]
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Problems with IQMath library
Next: Hardware Required