From: Z Man on
I have an HP Pavilion 1090n computer with ASUS PTGD1-LA motherboard. This
system supports SATA and I am adding a couple of external SATA hard drives
in Vantec Nexstar cases. I will probably purchase Hitachi 7K500 drives,
which support 3G. Question: does 3G SATA support have to be provided on the
system (motherboard or card), or just on the drives? Will I be limited to
1.5G performance even though I am using 3G drives? Does anyone know if this
motherboard supports 3G? If the answers are all negative, I could either
settle for 1.5G performance, or add a 3G card. This would mean removing the
modem (which I never use anyhow) to free up a slot, which I would consider.
Thanks.


From: Folkert Rienstra on
3 Gb SATA is for external raid cabinets.
3 Gb SATA does nothing for a single harddrive except for very
special applications that take advantage of the onboard cache.

"Z Man" <z1z(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:unjNf.1762$%a2.872(a)trndny05
> I have an HP Pavilion 1090n computer with ASUS PTGD1-LA motherboard. This
> system supports SATA and I am adding a couple of external SATA hard drives
> in Vantec Nexstar cases. I will probably purchase Hitachi 7K500 drives,
> which support 3G. Question: does 3G SATA support have to be provided on the
> system (motherboard or card), or just on the drives? Will I be limited to
> 1.5G performance even though I am using 3G drives? Does anyone know if this
> motherboard supports 3G? If the answers are all negative, I could either
> settle for 1.5G performance, or add a 3G card. This would mean removing the
> modem (which I never use anyhow) to free up a slot, which I would consider.
> Thanks.
From: Odie Ferrous on
Folkert Rienstra wrote:
>
> 3 Gb SATA is for external raid cabinets.

Is that *your* opinion, or is that fact? What's so special about an
"external" raid cabinet? Are you telling us that 3GB SATA precludes the
use of drives installed within the computer itself?


> 3 Gb SATA does nothing for a single harddrive except for very
> special applications that take advantage of the onboard cache.

I'd be inclined to go a step further and say that 3GB SATA is a waste of
space for practically everything.


Odie
--
Retrodata
www.retrodata.co.uk
Globally Local Data Recovery Experts

......oops - I know how much you like my sig. Here it is again.

--
Retrodata
www.retrodata.co.uk
Globally Local Data Recovery Experts
From: Harkhof on

"Odie Ferrous" <Odie_ferrous(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4406204E.3EC7D8FE(a)hotmail.com...
> Folkert Rienstra wrote:
>>
>> 3 Gb SATA is for external raid cabinets.
>
> Is that *your* opinion, or is that fact? What's so special about an
> "external" raid cabinet? Are you telling us that 3GB SATA precludes the
> use of drives installed within the computer itself?
>
>
>> 3 Gb SATA does nothing for a single harddrive except for very
>> special applications that take advantage of the onboard cache.
>
> I'd be inclined to go a step further and say that 3GB SATA is a waste of
> space for practically everything.
>

So what does this mean? I just bought 2 Seagate 250gb 3GBs. Right now I'm
using them as data and storage drives, but was considering getting another
for a boot drive (all previous drives are ATA). Am i wasting my time on 3GB?
Are they slower than 1.5? What's the reality here?

Thanks,
Hark


> Odie
> --
> Retrodata
> www.retrodata.co.uk
> Globally Local Data Recovery Experts
>
> .....oops - I know how much you like my sig. Here it is again.
>
> --
> Retrodata
> www.retrodata.co.uk
> Globally Local Data Recovery Experts


From: Arno Wagner on
Previously Odie Ferrous <Odie_ferrous(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Folkert Rienstra wrote:
>>
>> 3 Gb SATA is for external raid cabinets.

> Is that *your* opinion, or is that fact? What's so special about an
> "external" raid cabinet? Are you telling us that 3GB SATA precludes the
> use of drives installed within the computer itself?

Maybe the bots need to go faster with the external cabinet, since
the cable is longer and the Einstein Podolski Posenberg effect
comes into play if the cabinet is spinning fast enough?

>> 3 Gb SATA does nothing for a single harddrive except for very
>> special applications that take advantage of the onboard cache.

> I'd be inclined to go a step further and say that 3GB SATA is a
> waste of space for practically everything.

I have to disagree. 3Gb SATA is exactly the same size as 1.5Gb SATA!
So how can it be a waste of space if it does not waste any space
compared to the alternatove?

(Sorry, could not resist. Seriously, besides marketing I don't see
a reason for it either.)

Arno
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Prev: Jbod NAS
Next: ViPower Landisk - Best Firmware