From: Robert Love on
Let me quote from the December 19th "Space News" article entitled
Pentagon Scales Back SBIRS Program. For those who don't know, SBIRS is
a multi satellite program to detect missile launches via infra red
sensors. It is way behind and billions over budget, mostly due to the
sensor and bad initial design.

Air Force Sectretary Michael Wynne is quoted as saying:

One of the biggest problems with SBIRS lies with its opearting
software, which is based on a programming langauge called Ada that was
developed in the 1970's, Wynne said.

"Ada is a program that is not popular any longer," Wynne said. "It
is a software design that was literally invented around the time DOS was
invented. DOS is no longer even being talked about nor should Ada be,
but we still have Ada-based programmers trying to do it."


The Air Force hopes to use a more modern language like C+ (yes, they
used a single +) for SBIRS follow-on system, Air Force Undersecretary
Ronald Sega told reporters in a Dec. 15 briefing at the Pentagon.


Lord, there is so much wrong here. Where to start. Is it even worth it
to try and educate the Air Force? I suppose I'll try and write one of
these bozos once I calm down but I would say this is a huge slam against
our favorite language.
From: Björn Persson on
Michael Wynne must have been misquoted. He clearly didn't talk about Ada
but about that obscure language called ADA that we sometimes hear about. ;-)

--
Bj?rn Persson PGP key A88682FD
omb jor ers @sv ge.
r o.b n.p son eri nu
From: Jeffrey R. Carter on
Robert Love wrote:

> Lord, there is so much wrong here. Where to start. Is it even worth it
> to try and educate the Air Force? I suppose I'll try and write one of
> these bozos once I calm down but I would say this is a huge slam against
> our favorite language.

If we all knew how to contact these bozos, we could all write them. That might
be more impressive than just a message from you.

--
Jeff Carter
"Go and boil your bottoms."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
01
From: Robert Love on
In <hyCqf.5074$mj1.1275(a)newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net> Jeffrey R.
Carter wrote:
> Robert Love wrote:
>
>> Lord, there is so much wrong here. Where to start. Is it even worth
>> it to try and educate the Air Force? I suppose I'll try and write
>> one of these bozos once I calm down but I would say this is a huge
>> slam against our favorite language.
>
> If we all knew how to contact these bozos, we could all write them.
> That might be more impressive than just a message from you.

And I'm just a bozo to the Air Force brass. I wonder if we have a
senior statesman who could get their attention. Richard Rheile? Tucker
Taft? Damn, do any Congressional Medal of Honor winners program in Ada?

I did write a sincere, polite letter (postal, not e-mail) to the
Secretary but I don't expect it will get past his layer of filters. I
tried to refute his points and stressed the need for good design and
software development processe. I concluded that he should have the AF
Academy software experts or other independent group investigate the real
reason why the software was a failure.
From: tmoran on
>Let me quote from the December 19th "Space News" article entitled
>...
>is a software design that was literally invented around the time DOS was
>invented. DOS is no longer even being talked about nor should Ada be,
>...
> The Air Force hopes to use a more modern language like C+ (yes, they
Of course "The C Programming Language" was published 5 years before the
Ada 83 RM, and Ada 95, like C++, is about 10 years old. Perhaps for this
real-time, satellite based anti-missile system he means Microsoft's .NET
language, C#. Does "Space News" print letters to the editor with factual
corrections? Pointing out the ignorance of someone in authority is always
amusing.
But could it possibly be that this fellow just wants to give a new
contract to some big contributor, er, company to postpone the demise of
SBIRS till after he has moved elsewhere?
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Calling a DLL from GNAT
Next: WIA