From: Hiram Hackenbacker on
Gareth wrote:

>>>>>It's worse than that. The chances are your auctions will be pulled as a
>>>>>result of complaints from the mobile networks who object to the resale
>>>>>of SIM cards (which they oddly regard as being their property despite
>>>>>private ownership).
>>>>
>>>>And they'd be right, the SIM card is the property of the network operator
>>>>because the Ts&Cs explicitly state that as a condition of use.
>>>
>>>
>>>Bollocks.
>>>
>>>The SIM card is in private ownership and the T&Cs are a separate issue of
>>>private disagreement between the seller and the network.
>>>
>>>If the networks want to enforce their silly T&Cs then they should be
>>>forced to do so through the courts and not through half baked legal
>>>threats to Ebay.
>>
>>Well for 40+ years credit card companies have treated their cards in the
>>same way - i.e. - they remain their property. You would think the law
>>would have caught up with this sharp practice and you could use that case
>>precedent to own your own SIM :-)
>
>
> You do own the physical SIM in the same way as you own the physical plastic
> of the credit card.

A quick check on the back of my Barclaycard reveals this:- "This
card...is the property of Barclays Bank PLC". On the rear of my
Centurian card it states "This card is the property of the issuer [Amex]
and must be returned upon request". On my Maestro card it states "It is
the property of First Direct".

How exactly do I own the physical plastic? Surely the fact that I don't
own it allows banks and mechants to cut the card up in front of me in
special circumstances. I have always accepted that such cards and SIM
remain the property of the issuer - if that is what the T&C's have
stated. What law are you relying upon to circumvent this? Do your
cards differ from mine perhaps?
From: Luap on
Ivor Jones wrote:
> Gareth wrote:
>
>>"Brian Morrison" <scrapspam(a)fenrir.org.uk> wrote in message
>>news:z_6dncyFTr2MbYPfRVnyvw(a)eclipse.net.uk...
>>
>>>Gareth wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>It's worse than that. The chances are your auctions will be
>>>>pulled as a result of complaints from the mobile networks who
>>>>object to the resale of SIM cards (which they oddly regard as
>>>>being their property despite private ownership).
>>>
>>>And they'd be right, the SIM card is the property of the network
>>>operator because the Ts&Cs explicitly state that as a condition of
>>>use.
>>
>>Bollocks.
>>
>>The SIM card is in private ownership and the T&Cs are a separate
>>issue of private disagreement between the seller and the network.
>
>
> It's not bollocks at all. It is *clearly* stated in the T&C's that *you*
> sign and *agree to* when you take out a contract or buy a PAYG phone.
>
> You have agreed to it, therefore it is not bollocks.
>
> The fact that you don't like it is irrelevant. Go and find a network that
> does let you own the SIM, I wish you luck, do come back and tell us who it
> is..!
>
> Ivor
>
>

I've never signed anything on PAYG
Lua
From: Hiram Hackenbacker on
Luap wrote:

>>>> And they'd be right, the SIM card is the property of the network
>>>> operator because the Ts&Cs explicitly state that as a condition of
>>>> use.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bollocks.
>>>
>>> The SIM card is in private ownership and the T&Cs are a separate
>>> issue of private disagreement between the seller and the network.
>>
>>
>>
>> It's not bollocks at all. It is *clearly* stated in the T&C's that
>> *you* sign and *agree to* when you take out a contract or buy a PAYG
>> phone.
>>
>> You have agreed to it, therefore it is not bollocks.
>>
>> The fact that you don't like it is irrelevant. Go and find a network
>> that does let you own the SIM, I wish you luck, do come back and tell
>> us who it is..!
>>
>> Ivor
>>
>>
>
> I've never signed anything on PAYG

Correct - but then some contracts become binding even if you don't sign
- often you will accept those terms in using the service. This is true
of PAYG SIM's, buying a rail ticket, visiting certain websites, etc.

In practical terms PAYG users would present the networks with
difficultly if they tried to reclaim physical ownership of a given SIM -
that doesn't stop the network from still owning the SIM.
From: Ivor Jones on
Gareth wrote:

[snip]

> You own the SIM card and this is irrespective of the T&C contract.
> If someone steals the SIM card from you they are committing the
> offence of theft (against you and not against the network).

How can it be..? If you agree to the T&C's (and you have to to use the
network) and the T&C's state the SIM is the network's property, how can
you possibly argue otherwise..?!

Ivor


From: Ivor Jones on
Brian Morrison wrote:

[snip]

> As others have said, you agree to the terms when you enter into a
> contract with the operator, but with an unregistered pre-pay SIM
> there would be a question as to when this contract commences.

When you first make or receive a call, I would guess.

Ivor