From: Grant Edwards on
On 2008-05-06, Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> wrote:
> Tom??s ?? h??ilidhe wrote:
>> As I said elsethread, I've decided to run a 4-Bit counter into a 4-
>> to-16 decoder.
>
> That will work fine, as long as you don't mind the decoding glitches.

Or as long as he uses a gray-code counter. You can buy gray
code counters, can't you?

--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I wish I was on a
at Cincinnati street corner
visi.com holding a clean dog!
From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker on
Tom�s � h�ilidhe wrote:

> People advised me about this. They said stuff like "if a bit of noise
> gets onto...". The way I see it though, if I can't rely on electronics
> then there's no point in me even trying to get things to work.

That's rich, coming from you.

You could rely on electronics alright. You would have to stop
*designing* them with such total, aggressive disregard to reliability,
though. It's become clear that you don't listen to any advice along
those lines. That's your decision to make, sure, but that also makes
all advers consequences entirely your fault. We did tell you so.

> I've left my current board on overnight for three nights in a row and
> it was still synchronised.

How do you know it's "still" synchronized, as opposed to having rebooted
and re-synchronized itself 20 times (always while you weren't looking) over?

Anyway, a test like that proves diddly-squat. You have to stress it to
expose flaws. Switch on a mobile phone directly on top of your device.
Fire up a piezo lighter in different places. Heat it. Cool it. Drop
it. Flex it. In short: let it see some abuse.
From: Eric Smith on
Tomás Ó hÉilidhe <toe(a)lavabit.com> writes:
> The only problem though is that I need a chip that will count to 16
> instead of 10. Does anyone know of a similar chip that will cycle thru
> 16 different outputs?

Sure, a CPLD. Xilinx XC9536 (5V) or XC9536XL (3.3V) come to mind.
From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe on
On May 5, 9:33 pm, Eric Smith <e...(a)brouhaha.com> wrote:
> Tomás Ó hÉilidhe <t...(a)lavabit.com> writes:
>
> > The only problem though is that I need a chip that will count to 16
> > instead of 10. Does anyone know of a similar chip that will cycle thru
> > 16 different outputs?
>
> Sure, a CPLD.  Xilinx XC9536 (5V) or XC9536XL (3.3V) come to mind.


Too expensive.

As I said elsethread, I've decided to run a 4-Bit counter into a 4-
to-16 decoder.

From: Eric Smith on
Tomás Ó hÉilidhe wrote:
> As I said elsethread, I've decided to run a 4-Bit counter into a 4-
> to-16 decoder.

That will work fine, as long as you don't mind the decoding glitches.