|
Prev: Decent drums
Next: Pro Audio 5! with XP?
From: Gary Evans on 10 Sep 2005 11:48 Frank L wrote: > Gary, > If your happy and things are nice, you should stay with what you have if it > works good for you. That's the Bottomline. I probably won't upgrade because > I have come to realize that S4Producer has all and more than what I need. > The roland Voice thing might be cool, but not enough for me. And I have the > machine for it, just do not need it. > Frank L > > "Gary Evans" <maestro(a)onemansband.ca> wrote in message > news:06qdndGiKOlGVr3eRVn-1A(a)rogers.com... > >>kitekrazy wrote: >> >>>Gary Evans wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Fine print also says P5 will only run on Win XP. I'm not sure I'm yet >>>>willing to give up a very stable Win 2000 installation, (DAW dedicated). >>>>I HOPE this is wrong info. >>>> >>>>maestro >>> >>> >>> You could always have a dual boot system. >> >>But it ain't broken ... far from it ...like so many million other Win 2k >>(big business) installations that MS would love to sell XP into. Maybe >>Cake feels the hyperthreading, dual core Pentium thingy stuff is a bigger >>potential market than us Luddites that still actually pluck strings, whack >>keyboards, bang skins etc. to make the majority of our music. >> >>maestro > > > My(32 bit)DAW would handle XP easily, but, since dedicated for Sonar & Finale, never needed it. I also admit having a problem with the MS 'my way or the highway' attitude for updates and browser compatibility etc. as well, though I have paid for every OS I've ever installed since the first release of DOS. The Roland vocal thing would have been interesting to me also. maestro
From: Gary Evans on 10 Sep 2005 11:53 Pat Farrell wrote: > Gary R. Hook wrote: > > >>kitekrazy wrote: >> >>> You could always have a dual boot system. >> >>Be sure to install XP _last_ > > > than install Linux and get off the Windoz adiction :-) > > I really AM trying to kick the habit, (Firefox, T-Bird, Open Office, Inkscape etc.). Unfortunately, music apps with the power of their much more mature Windoz and Mack counterparts just aren't there yet - for me, at least. maestro
From: Pat Farrell on 10 Sep 2005 15:43
Gary Evans wrote: > Pat Farrell wrote: >> than install Linux and get off the Windoz adiction :-) > I really AM trying to kick the habit, (Firefox, T-Bird, Open Office, > Inkscape etc.). Unfortunately, music apps with the power of their much > more mature Windoz and Mack counterparts just aren't there yet - for me, > at least. It is really hard. I'm pretty sure that nothing compares to Sonar, even an older version. And I'm not crazy to try to run anything as complex as Sonar under wine or one of the other crutch tools. I would expect something like n-tracks would be ported much sooner than any of the Sonar/Cubase/ProTools/... code. -- Pat |