Prev: DOF preview in OVFs of DSLRs is crippled
Next: Please see new photos of Viking ship models
From: John P Sheehy on 18 Jun 2008 08:57
nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in news:170620081406183919%
nospam(a)nospam.invalid:

> nonsense. b/w resolution charts measure luminance resolution which is
> what matters to human vision. colour resolution charts exploit a known
> weakness of bayer and make foveon look better than it really is (which
> is why foveon fans insist on colour res charts).

Blue vs green, which is Foveon's weakest area, is omitted.

--
John Sheehy
From: John P Sheehy on 18 Jun 2008 08:59
Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse(a)ilyaz.org> wrote in news:g38t8a$24uo$1
@agate.berkeley.edu:

> Can't agree less. "True" resolution is what I can or can't see.

It doesn't matter if it has any direct relationship to what was suppposed
to be recorded?

Does a dull print viewed through shattered glass have more resolution?

--
John Sheehy
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: DOF preview in OVFs of DSLRs is crippled
Next: Please see new photos of Viking ship models