From: Hikaru Masayoshi on
the holly books of relativity define speed
of light as constant, while its consistency
is void

they cant define nor agree, what you see
and detect is not light, but atoms of an object,

and objects do not need to travel, good bye
From: Karl Heinz on
Hikaru Masayoshi:

> the holly books of relativity define speed
> of light as constant, while its consistency
> is void

what do you mean?
From: Hikaru Masayoshi on
On Jul 22, 8:21 pm, Karl Heinz <karlhe...(a)sofort-mail.de> wrote:
> Hikaru Masayoshi:
>
> > the holly books of relativity define speed
> > of light as constant, while its consistency
> > is void
>
> what do you mean?

consistency of light, void
From: Paul Cardinale on
On Jul 22, 11:21 am, Karl Heinz <karlhe...(a)sofort-mail.de> wrote:
> Hikaru Masayoshi:
>
> > the holly books of relativity define speed
> > of light as constant, while its consistency
> > is void
>
> what do you mean?

He might be a fake idiot.
From: BURT on
On Jul 22, 12:10 pm, Paul Cardinale <pcardin...(a)volcanomail.com>
wrote:
> On Jul 22, 11:21 am, Karl Heinz <karlhe...(a)sofort-mail.de> wrote:
>
> > Hikaru Masayoshi:
>
> > > the holly books of relativity define speed
> > > of light as constant, while its consistency
> > > is void
>
> > what do you mean?
>
> He might be a fake idiot.

The speed of light is a pushed constant through empty space.

Mitch Raemsch