|
From: London.Embankment on 19 Jun 2008 05:58 Word up peepz! did you hear that Apple has invented SproutCore. It was announced at the end of WWDC on Friday last week. I don't know what it is or what it does but it's supposed to be da bomb (which is urban slag for saying it's 'fandabbydozy'). I think it's to do with writing your own web applications. some peepz think the future of apps is on the web (like Google Docs). I beg to differ : I really do. Can you imagine something like photoshop running as a web app? It would be really sucky.
From: fudo on 19 Jun 2008 12:18 In article <a35c7bf2-a8ca-427e-86ed-19e98d887d70(a)w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, London.Embankment(a)googlemail.com wrote: > Word up peepz! did you hear that Apple has invented SproutCore. It was > announced at the end of WWDC on Friday last week. > > I don't know what it is or what it does but it's supposed to be da > bomb (which is urban slag for saying it's 'fandabbydozy'). > > I think it's to do with writing your own web applications. some peepz > think the future of apps is on the web (like Google Docs). I beg to > differ : I really do. Can you imagine something like photoshop running > as a web app? It would be really sucky. You don't know what it is, or what it does, but you know it's going to be sucky? Plonk. -- signone
From: Calum on 19 Jun 2008 15:45 London.Embankment(a)googlemail.com wrote: > I think it's to do with writing your own web applications. some peepz > think the future of apps is on the web (like Google Docs). I beg to > differ : I really do. Can you imagine something like photoshop running > as a web app? It would be really sucky. What, you mean like <http://www.photoshop.com/express>? Yep, that'll never happen.
From: London.Embankment on 20 Jun 2008 05:13 On Jun 19, 8:45 pm, Calum <com.gm...(a)scottishwildcat.nospam> wrote: > London.Embankm...(a)googlemail.com wrote: > > I think it's to do with writing your own web applications. some peepz > > think the future of apps is on the web (like Google Docs). I beg to > > differ : I really do. Can you imagine something like photoshop running > > as a web app? It would be really sucky. > > What, you mean like <http://www.photoshop.com/express>? Yep, that'll > never happen. It exists, but I bet it's sucky in comparison to CS3.
From: Calum on 20 Jun 2008 06:30 London.Embankment(a)googlemail.com wrote: > On Jun 19, 8:45 pm, Calum <com.gm...(a)scottishwildcat.nospam> wrote: >> London.Embankm...(a)googlemail.com wrote: >>> I think it's to do with writing your own web applications. some peepz >>> think the future of apps is on the web (like Google Docs). I beg to >>> differ : I really do. Can you imagine something like photoshop running >>> as a web app? It would be really sucky. >> What, you mean like <http://www.photoshop.com/express>? Yep, that'll >> never happen. > > It exists, but I bet it's sucky in comparison to CS3. It's not supposed to compare to CS3-- different application, different audience, early days for the technology. But since you've obviously never tried it, your opinion of its worth doesn't really count for much.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Rearview Mirror Hands free discount Next: iWork on Apple's "Featured 3rd Party Downloads" |