From: Andy Shevchenko on
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Prashant P. Shah <pshah.mumbai(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a patch to the wl_profile.c file that fixes the C99 comments
> style issues found by the checkpatch.pl tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prashant P. Shah <pshah.mumbai(a)gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_profile.c |   54 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_profile.c b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_profile.c
> index 13ade70..4a3b64d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_profile.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_profile.c

....

> @@ -118,17 +118,17 @@ int parse_yes_no(char *value);
>
>  int parse_yes_no(char *value)
>  {
> -int rc = 0;                                                                            //default to NO for invalid parameters
> +int rc = 0;                                                                            /* default to NO for invalid parameters */
>
>        if (strlen(value) == 1) {
>                if ((value[0] | ('Y'^'y')) == 'y')
>                        rc = 1;
> -//     } else {
> -//             this should not be debug time info, it is an enduser data entry error ;?
> -//             DBG_WARNING(DbgInfo, "%s invalid; will be ignored\n", PARM_NAME_MICROWAVE_ROBUSTNESS);
> +/*     } else {
> +               this should not be debug time info, it is an enduser data entry error ;?
> +               DBG_WARNING(DbgInfo, "%s invalid; will be ignored\n", PARM_NAME_MICROWAVE_ROBUSTNESS); */
In such case you have lost the internal comments. I think it should look like
/*
} else {
/* ... */
....
*/


>        }
>        return rc;
> -} // parse_yes_no
> +} /* parse_yes_no */
>
>
>  /*******************************************************************************


--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Prashant Shah on
Hi,

>> -// � � } else {
>> -// � � � � � � this should not be debug time info, it is an enduser data entry error ;?
>> -// � � � � � � DBG_WARNING(DbgInfo, "%s invalid; will be ignored\n", PARM_NAME_MICROWAVE_ROBUSTNESS);
>> +/* � � } else {
>> + � � � � � � � this should not be debug time info, it is an enduser data entry error ;?
>> + � � � � � � � DBG_WARNING(DbgInfo, "%s invalid; will be ignored\n", PARM_NAME_MICROWAVE_ROBUSTNESS); */
> In such case you have lost the internal comments. I think it should look like
> /*
> } else {
> /* ... */

Sent a new patch. I tried the nested comments but gcc wont handle it
correctly (maybe I am wrong here). Please discard the old patch and
use this new one.

-// } else {
-// this should not be debug time info, it is an enduser
data entry error ;?
-// DBG_WARNING(DbgInfo, "%s invalid; will be ignored\n",
PARM_NAME_MICROWAVE_ROBUSTNESS);
+ /* } else { */
+ /* this should not be debug time info, it is an
enduser data entry error ;? */
+ /* DBG_WARNING(DbgInfo, "%s invalid; will be
ignored\n", PARM_NAME_MICROWAVE_ROBUSTNESS); */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/