From: Moshe on
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Rex Ballard
wrote:

> On Jun 25, 9:44�pm, Ignoramus31989 <ignoramus31...(a)NOSPAM.
> 31989.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2010-06-26, Moshe <goldee_loxnbag...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Ooops!
>>> Silly me!
>
>>> That was the Apple iPhone 4G *not* the open source
>>> OpenMoko phone.
>
> It's not neccessary to stand in line for your chance to get an Android
> powered phone.

I never said anything about an Android phone.

Are you guys all stupid or something?
From: bbgruff on
Moshe wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Rex Ballard
> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 25, 9:44 pm, Ignoramus31989 <ignoramus31...(a)NOSPAM.
>> 31989.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2010-06-26, Moshe <goldee_loxnbag...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Ooops!
>>>> Silly me!
>>
>>>> That was the Apple iPhone 4G *not* the open source
>>>> OpenMoko phone.
>>
>> It's not neccessary to stand in line for your chance to get an Android
>> powered phone.
>
> I never said anything about an Android phone.

Of course you didn't. You were talking about phones, and what you said
was:-
"Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!"

"Linux fails once again."

You are now being told that Linux (Android) certainly has *not* failed on
phones.

> Are you guys all stupid or something?

Something. It looks to me as though it's *you* that's stupid.
Just stop blowing smoke, flatfish - you fouled up again.



From: chrisv on
> Hadron quacked:
>>
>> It's not a win for Linux.

Well, of course Android "doesn't count" as a Linux success, "true
Linux advocate" Hadron Quark. (rolling eyes)

But your masters know otherwise, as do you. You are a liar.

--
"All of these are valuable in Windows platforms too which is, frankly,
where the money is after you graduate." - "True Linux advocate"
Hadron Quark