"Tonight with Trevor Mcdonald" ITV tonight
in [UK Mobile]
|
Prev: get a FREE SIM Network Card
Next: Unlocking t630
From: Ivor Jones on 7 Feb 2005 18:14 Dutch wrote: > "David Marshall" <dave(a)fof.durge.org> wrote in message > news:cu8mav$4qb$1(a)fof.durge.org... >> In article <36q2g8F51jjv6U1(a)individual.net>, >> Ivor Jones <ivor(a)despammed.invalid> wrote: >>> I kept wondering how many of those people protesting had mobiles >>> and where they suggest the masts should go. >> >> "I don't mind masts, but why do they have to build them near where >> people live?" and other such well-thought-out arguments. > > There is perfectly adequate areas in most places where a mast could > be errected, yet still have metres upon metres (ie: 50 metres) > boundary. The only problemw ould then be to stop people getting > near it. It should be a council-backed plan. > > Having recently being one of the many scientists to help contribute > to research regarding children using mobile phones, children + > mobiles = uh oh! I fail to understand how people can accept typical > human nature. We accept things as they come, then look back and > realise the mistakes we made. > With lots of health-risk factors in the world it would do us all > good to take heed of the advice many experts give, especially when > it comes to mobile phone radiation. There we go, the scary word "radiation" again. > In time, I'm one hundred percent certain there will be many a shock > for your common mobile-phone user, especially when 3G is considered > 'standard' and 2G is obselete. It's just quite upsetting for the > sake of convienance; yet realistically your average Joe isn't > really all that aware of the state of their own health. Look in > your average british high street to see what modern life has done > to us. Never mind that, nobody in this thread has yet given much consideration to my point of scaremongers screaming "protect our children, stop these horrible masts..!" but saying nothing about the self same children wandering around the school playground with far more RF entering their poor little brains from the handsets they have clamped to their ears than they will ever get from living next to a mast for years. Ivor
From: Pyriform on 7 Feb 2005 18:36 Ivor Jones wrote: > Never mind that, nobody in this thread has yet given much > consideration to my point of scaremongers screaming "protect our > children, stop these horrible masts..!" but saying nothing about the > self same children wandering around the school playground with far > more RF entering their poor little brains from the handsets they have > clamped to their ears than they will ever get from living next to a > mast for years. Quite so. Most of the protesting dimwits have their own mobile phones and would benefit greatly from a lesson in the inverse square law, inserted rectally.
From: Dave C on 8 Feb 2005 04:11 David Marshall wrote: > > "I don't mind masts, but why do they have to build them near where people > live?" and other such well-thought-out arguments. > Probably because that is where people live and us mobile phones? -- Dave C
From: Paul Busby on 8 Feb 2005 05:01 Thus spake Dave C: > David Marshall wrote: > >> >> "I don't mind masts, but why do they have to build them near where >> people live?" and other such well-thought-out arguments. >> > Probably because that is where people live and us mobile phones? I think he's being ironic with his quote ;) Of course masts should be near users - that includes schools! Many masts or more accurately, BSTs don't even look like masts anyhow & operate without fuss in places like shopping malls. -- Thank people in advance? Thanking or cursing them afterwards at least gives some feedback!
From: DubDriver on 8 Feb 2005 20:32
"Lumpy" <spamcage(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1107852495.870231.199580(a)o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > Ivor Jones wrote: > >> I kept wondering how many of those people protesting had mobiles and > where >> they suggest the masts should go. > > I've often wondered why, around Orpington, there are so few mobile > masts. The closest ones (according to the OfCom site) are on top of the > hospital. Next closest (to me) are in Petts Wood. ROOF LEVEL (0155) FIRE STATION ADJ 11, AVALON ROAD, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL NEWSTEAD WOOD GIRLS, AVEBURY ROAD, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (C1536) ALKHAM TOWER, BAPCHILD PLACE, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (TN0007/00203370) CHARMWOOD FARM, CHARMWOOD LANE, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (BR0022) 4, CHATSWORTH PARADE, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (GLN 0508) 1-12 CUXTON, CREST VIEW DRIVE, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (6105) HORTON TOWER, HARBLEDOWN PLACE, ST MARY CRAY, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL BR0030/00206118 TEMPLEGATE HOUSE 115-123, HIGH STREET, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (BR0033) KENNEDY HOUSE, MURRAY ROAD, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (BR0029) THE CRAYFISH, PETERSHAM DRIVE, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL 98011 AT 70, QUEENSWAY, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (GLN 638) ORPINGTON HOSPITAL, SEVENOAKS ROAD, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (33925) ORPINGTON HOSPITAL, SEVENOAKS ROAD, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (90301) ORPINGTON HOSPITAL, SEVENOAKS ROAD, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (BR0028/00135402) ORPINGTON HOSPITAL, SEVENOAKS ROAD, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (GLN 0226) MIDDLE GASOMETER, SEVENOAKS WAY, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (GLN 0283) ORPINGTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE, THE WALNUTS, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL 008688, THE WALNUTS, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (10032) CROWN BUILDINGS, THE WALNUTS, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (90254) BEKESBOURNE TOWER, WICHLING CLOSE, ORPINGTON, KENT ROOF LEVEL (BR0032) CHELSFIELD PUBLIC HOUSE 1, WINDSOR DRIVE, ORPINGTON, KENT |