Took a Reaper Track to Nashville
in [Cakewalk]
|
From: Nil on 21 Apr 2008 09:23 On 21 Apr 2008, "Sue Morton" <867-5309(a)domain.invalid> wrote in cakewalk.audio: > And don't forget, if you sell that song you may owe the Reaper > folks $175 upgrade fee :-) What?!?!? Is that some bizarre clause in their license, that you have to give them more money if you make some from their product?
From: Sue Morton on 21 Apr 2008 09:50 No bizarre clauses, it's straight up. It's a commercial use license vs. home studio (for-fun?) license. See the Reaper site. Commercial licenses are currently $225. I was just giving John a bad time since he said his Reaper mix stacked up well with the commercial ones he heard. Selling songwriting using Reaper mixes is probably not in the commercial license category :-) -- Sue Morton Nil wrote: > On 21 Apr 2008, "Sue Morton" <867-5309(a)domain.invalid> wrote in > cakewalk.audio: > >> And don't forget, if you sell that song you may owe the Reaper >> folks $175 upgrade fee :-) > > What?!?!? Is that some bizarre clause in their license, that you have > to give them more money if you make some from their product?
From: malachi on 21 Apr 2008 10:33
"Sue Morton" <867-5309(a)domain.invalid> wrote in message news:X20Pj.5020$iK6.1583(a)nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com... >I hear ya on that one. I'm so tired of fighting the software. >Unfortunately Reaper is in that same boat for me, I still have crashes and >performance problems in areas where they don't exist with Sonar :-( {sigh}. > > And don't forget, if you sell that song you may owe the Reaper folks $175 > upgrade fee :-) Still a bargain if it does the job for you! > -- > Sue Morton > Knowing how business is done in Nashville, I can be confident that I won't be making any money or owing an upgrade license fee for a *long* time. :) m |