Trigger hover pseudo class using javascript?
in [JavaScript]
|
From: Ciaran on 28 Apr 2010 07:17 On Apr 28, 11:27 am, Ry Nohryb <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: > On Apr 28, 4:43 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...(a)web.de> > wrote: > > > > > (...) There is no "javascript" (...) > > This is comp.lang.ecmascript ? > -- Ha ha maybe it's comp.lang.philosophy So anyway, the answer is no? A pseudo class can't be triggered via JS? I'm not looking for workarounds - It's more of an interesting idea than a problem I'm having. Cheers, Ciarán "Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth... There is no javascript."
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 28 Apr 2010 07:43 Andrew Poulos wrote: > On 28/04/2010 7:59 PM, John G Harris wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 at 04:43:19, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas >> 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> >> >> I had to rescue IE8 with Ctl|Alt|Del to get out of this page. Sorry. Are you sure you have let it be loaded completely? It has become quite large, so it may take some time. Which version of IE 8 have you used? Have you perhaps accessed a previous revision of the Matrix where there were no problems (then I could consider reverting to that)? TIA. >> What have you done ? Nothing deliberately harmful to IE (8). >> What is object.js ? It is the base library. > IE 8 on Vista warns that Does it warn, does it error out, or does it break there? > Not implemented > object.js, line 308 character 7 Thank you. Apparently there is a problem with | if (typeof window != "undefined" && typeof window.onerror != "undefined") | { | window.onerror = fHandler; ^ | } that the feature test could not deal with. I am using this as a fallback mechanism for exceptions in jsx.setErrorHandler(). Since this method is called from several others, and I do not have Windows Vista to test with, could someone possibly provide a stack trace, or more insight as to why the test would be passed but the assignment would not work, please? TIA. PointedEars -- realism: HTML 4.01 Strict evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml -- Bjoern Hoehrmann
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 28 Apr 2010 07:45 Ciaran wrote: > So anyway, the answer is no? No, the answer is "depends". Read again. PointedEars -- realism: HTML 4.01 Strict evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml -- Bjoern Hoehrmann
From: Ry Nohryb on 28 Apr 2010 08:05 On Apr 28, 11:59 am, John G Harris <j...(a)nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 at 04:43:19, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas > > 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > ><http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> > > I had to rescue IE8 with Ctl|Alt|Del to get out of this page. What have > you done ? What is object.js ? See ? that's the prove that "javascript frameworks is a disruptive technology" -- Jorge.
From: Jake Jarvis on 28 Apr 2010 08:18
On 28.04.2010 13:43, wrote Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn: > Andrew Poulos wrote: > >> On 28/04/2010 7:59 PM, John G Harris wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 at 04:43:19, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas >>> 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>> <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> >>> >>> I had to rescue IE8 with Ctl|Alt|Del to get out of this page. > > Sorry. Are you sure you have let it be loaded completely? It has become > quite large, so it may take some time. Which version of IE 8 have you used? > Have you perhaps accessed a previous revision of the Matrix where there were > no problems (then I could consider reverting to that)? TIA. > >>> What have you done ? > > Nothing deliberately harmful to IE (8). > >>> What is object.js ? > > It is the base library. > >> IE 8 on Vista warns that > > Does it warn, does it error out, or does it break there? > >> Not implemented >> object.js, line 308 character 7 > > Thank you. Apparently there is a problem with > > | if (typeof window != "undefined" && typeof window.onerror != "undefined") > | { > | window.onerror = fHandler; > ^ > | } > > that the feature test could not deal with. > > I am using this as a fallback mechanism for exceptions in > jsx.setErrorHandler(). Since this method is called from several others, and > I do not have Windows Vista to test with, could someone possibly provide a > stack trace, or more insight as to why the test would be passed but the > assignment would not work, please? TIA. > It's also erroring with "Nicht implementiert" (~ "not implemented") in Windows XP SP 3, IE 8.0.6001.18702 here. I'll try to copy the stack trace: | JScript anonymous function object.js line 308 | JScript anonymous function refers to debug.js, line 50 `setErrorHandler();` | JScript global code So it appears you can not assign undefined to window.onerror in ie8 the following <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>window.onerror test</title> <script type="text/javascript"> function foo() { window.onerror = undefined; } </script> </head> <body onload="foo();"> <p>assigning `undefined` to window.onerror</p> </body> </html> also fails here -- Jake Jarvis |