Prev: [PATCH] net: Add getsockopt support for TCP thin-streams
Next: [PATCH v4 0/2] cgroups: implement moving a threadgroup's threads atomically with cgroup.procs
From: Xiaofan Chen on 30 Jul 2010 20:00
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:01 AM, David Brownell <david-b(a)pacbell.net> wrote:
>> Or does Windows really care about the vid/pid for
>> a class device somehow?
>
> My understanding is that it does, since it really
> doesn't have a good concept of "class" being the
> generic thing. �INF files embed VIDS/PIDS even
> for drivers implementing class specs. �MSFT was
> being stupid again...
>

It depends. For Mass Storage device and HID device,
no INF file is needed. So the VID/PID really does not
matter for them. For CDC-ACM or USB RNDIS,
an INF is needed.


--
Xiaofan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [PATCH] net: Add getsockopt support for TCP thin-streams
Next: [PATCH v4 0/2] cgroups: implement moving a threadgroup's threads atomically with cgroup.procs