From: Greg KH on
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:30:02PM +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> This patch corrects a problem with the merge of a previous
> patch to add the CONTEC identifier.

What patch had the merge problem? Did I just end up duplicating stuff
incorrectly? What was the git commit id?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Greg KH on
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:08:19AM +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I believe the merge problem occurred with the commit:
>
> dee5658b482e9e2ac7d6205dc876fc11d4008138
>
> Originally I submitted a patch and then they asked me to order the IDs
> and resubmit, so did I. But unfortunately in the end somehow both
> patches were merged.
>
> [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: add CONTEC vendor and product id
> [PATCH resubmit] USB: serial: ftdi: add CONTEC vendor and product id
>
> Was I supposed to do the resubmit patch in a way that would unpatch
> the first patch? Or is the word resubmit enough to know that this is
> the good patch?

This is good, I just wanted to know this information as to what went
wrong. I'll put this into the changelog entry.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/