From: Al Viro on
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:35:51PM -0500, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> The fact that may_open() could truncate a file gave me a lot of
> heartburn when working on union mounts, so I was thrilled to see that
> truncate handling has been moved out of may_open() in Al's for-next
> tree. However, it seems to me that the surrounding elaborate
> mnt_want_write() dance is no longer needed? If so, this also
> simplifies Ogawa Hirofumi "Fix use-after-free of vfsmount by
> mnt_drop_write()" patch.
>
> Against Al's for-next branch. Lightly tested, please review.

Val, anything around do_filp_open() should be on top of #untested. The
whole area gets rewritten there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Valerie Aurora on
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:08:27PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:35:51PM -0500, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> > The fact that may_open() could truncate a file gave me a lot of
> > heartburn when working on union mounts, so I was thrilled to see that
> > truncate handling has been moved out of may_open() in Al's for-next
> > tree. However, it seems to me that the surrounding elaborate
> > mnt_want_write() dance is no longer needed? If so, this also
> > simplifies Ogawa Hirofumi "Fix use-after-free of vfsmount by
> > mnt_drop_write()" patch.
> >
> > Against Al's for-next branch. Lightly tested, please review.
>
> Val, anything around do_filp_open() should be on top of #untested. The
> whole area gets rewritten there.

Nice! That's a huge improvement. I will happily rebase.

Thanks,

-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/