From: Mary Oakes on
Hey everyone,

A client has 6 brand new hp pavilions, one is a pavillion elite 9340f
quad
core and 5 are hp pavillion 6400f dual core on which I am running a
peer to peer network with a single win32 application all running Vista
Home Premium SP1, uac turned off.

We intended to load the VO app and the data onto the 9340 box, but
we have a problem networking to any of the new boxes.. If I run the
app
on any of the new computers, I get this message on the workstation:

Description:
A problem caused this program to stop interacting with Windows.

Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: AppHangB1
Application Name: Explorer.EXE
Application Version: 6.0.6001.18000
Application Timestamp: 47918e5d
Hang Signature: ccf9
Hang Type: 0
OS Version: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.768.3
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Hang Signature 1: e5b07b9b6c71a73c571c073d2648eff6
Additional Hang Signature 2: 7298
Additional Hang Signature 3: ad660cbecddc5e0e7277b675a4de204e
Additional Hang Signature 4: ccf9
Additional Hang Signature 5: e5b07b9b6c71a73c571c073d2648eff6
Additional Hang Signature 6: 7298
Additional Hang Signature 7: ad660cbecddc5e0e7277b675a4de204e

I can run the vo app using the old "server" box, an XP Pro machine,
and,
I can run the vo app from my Vista laptop running Vista Ultimate using
the new hp's as workstations.

Does anyone have experience with this? Is there is a "buggy" version
of windows explorer on the new Vista boxes???

Windows explorer 6.0.6000.16549 on the ultimate box is working fine.
Windows Explorer version 6.0..6001.18000 on he hp elite 64 bit Vista
home premium box is not working.

Thanks in advance for any help!!!!!

Mary O

From: Dave Francis on
Mary,

Is this Vista forum answer any help? I've had similar problems on Acer
boxes.

http://thevistaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=10892

HTH

Dave Francis

"Mary Oakes" <oakesfulmer(a)embarqmail.com> wrote in message
news:7efc3619-fcc3-4bae-acbe-8d836add7a74(a)f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Hey everyone,
>
> A client has 6 brand new hp pavilions, one is a pavillion elite 9340f
> quad
> core and 5 are hp pavillion 6400f dual core on which I am running a
> peer to peer network with a single win32 application all running Vista
> Home Premium SP1, uac turned off.
>
> We intended to load the VO app and the data onto the 9340 box, but
> we have a problem networking to any of the new boxes.. If I run the
> app
> on any of the new computers, I get this message on the workstation:
>
> Description:
> A problem caused this program to stop interacting with Windows.
>
> Problem signature:
> Problem Event Name: AppHangB1
> Application Name: Explorer.EXE
> Application Version: 6.0.6001.18000
> Application Timestamp: 47918e5d
> Hang Signature: ccf9
> Hang Type: 0
> OS Version: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.768.3
> Locale ID: 1033
> Additional Hang Signature 1: e5b07b9b6c71a73c571c073d2648eff6
> Additional Hang Signature 2: 7298
> Additional Hang Signature 3: ad660cbecddc5e0e7277b675a4de204e
> Additional Hang Signature 4: ccf9
> Additional Hang Signature 5: e5b07b9b6c71a73c571c073d2648eff6
> Additional Hang Signature 6: 7298
> Additional Hang Signature 7: ad660cbecddc5e0e7277b675a4de204e
>
> I can run the vo app using the old "server" box, an XP Pro machine,
> and,
> I can run the vo app from my Vista laptop running Vista Ultimate using
> the new hp's as workstations.
>
> Does anyone have experience with this? Is there is a "buggy" version
> of windows explorer on the new Vista boxes???
>
> Windows explorer 6.0.6000.16549 on the ultimate box is working fine.
> Windows Explorer version 6.0..6001.18000 on he hp elite 64 bit Vista
> home premium box is not working.
>
> Thanks in advance for any help!!!!!
>
> Mary O
>


From: Mary Oakes on
Thank you, Dave. But no. The post addresses a similar problem with IE.
There are other complaints about this and explorer.exe but I could not
find any solutions.

I have posted on the Vista ng and also sent email to HP.

HP has just suggested that I tun windows firewall off (which I had
already done) and also try running the app in xp pro sp2 compatibility
mode.

I am trying that next and will report back.

Mary
From: Williem on
Geoff,

You are missing the point. Mary said that this is a peer to peer
network so there is no 2008 server involved. I do agree that VO apps
run inder Vista just fine. I have a bunch out there. I believe that
the root of Mary's issue is "permissions". Being that it is peer to
peer, there is no DC to control the userid/pwd so Vista users peer
permissions and passes a token around with the person's credentials.
If there is not a matching userid/pwd on the machine that is acting as
the server, the permissions will come in lower and that is what I
suspect is the issue.

Regards,

Willie
From: Geoff Schaller on
Willie.

You missed the point :-). I realise she said peer to peer. Server 2008
and Vista are basically the same at that level (IE etc) because they use
the same technology for such things so I was just making the point that
'vista' is working fine for VO apps under a range of circumstances. Mary
seemed to imply that IE was the issue.

From a peer to peer point of view, there is no difference between XP and
Vista that matters. If there is no domain then I presume they have
enabled simple file sharing but quite obviously this is where the issue
is. We have some customers who just use peer to peer with XP and Vista
mixed. It works there so a solution should be possible. It will be to do
with rights or an inconsistent file share.

I still think they should update. We did nothing special to get our
clients working, in fact, they just worked without our intervention.

Geoff



"Williem" <wcm469(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0c7f6f00-cf35-42c8-af34-6c02cb069fa4(a)k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com:

> Geoff,
>
> You are missing the point. Mary said that this is a peer to peer
> network so there is no 2008 server involved. I do agree that VO apps
> run inder Vista just fine. I have a bunch out there. I believe that
> the root of Mary's issue is "permissions". Being that it is peer to
> peer, there is no DC to control the userid/pwd so Vista users peer
> permissions and passes a token around with the person's credentials.
> If there is not a matching userid/pwd on the machine that is acting as
> the server, the permissions will come in lower and that is what I
> suspect is the issue.
>
> Regards,
>
> Willie

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Pushbutton
Next: VO and Lotus Notes