|
From: Ian Worthington on 16 Jan 2008 10:13 I first started this thread last year (http://groups.google.com/group/ comp.periphs.scanners/browse_thread/thread/35335d1555f9fd8c/ 5edf75dba9525b67?hl=en#5edf75dba9525b67) but then got very busy at work and ran out of time. I've looked at the results with Vuescan 8.3.75 today and dust removal (colour negs) sill doesn't work (IR3, heavy removal). Looking more closely it seems the IR channel appears to be displaced from the RGB image. Is this possible? Could I have a bad unit? The scanner appeared to do two physical passes: is this expected?) ian ....
From: Barry Watzman on 16 Jan 2008 23:31 The Nikon scanners should not have any registration problems. Because they use LED illumination, unlike other forms of illumination (lamps), all "passes" for the final scan are done at once. As the mechanism stops at each "scan line", the unit "flashes" the separate LEDs for red, blue, green and IR in sequence, then the carriage moves to the next "scan line". There are (or may be, depending on settings) multiple passes, but they are for auto-focus, auto-exposure and then the actual scan. However, as far as I understand the actual scan itself is done in a single pass. Ian Worthington wrote: > I first started this thread last year (http://groups.google.com/group/ > comp.periphs.scanners/browse_thread/thread/35335d1555f9fd8c/ > 5edf75dba9525b67?hl=en#5edf75dba9525b67) but then got very busy at > work and ran out of time. > > I've looked at the results with Vuescan 8.3.75 today and dust removal > (colour negs) sill doesn't work (IR3, heavy removal). > > Looking more closely it seems the IR channel appears to be displaced > from the RGB image. Is this possible? Could I have a bad unit? The > scanner appeared to do two physical passes: is this expected?) > > > ian > ...
From: Steven Saunderson on 17 Jan 2008 03:06 On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:13:31 -0800 (PST), Ian Worthington <ianworthington(a)usa.net> wrote: > Looking more closely it seems the IR channel appears to be displaced > from the RGB image. Is this possible? Could I have a bad unit? The > scanner appeared to do two physical passes: is this expected?) The FS4000 needs two passes. The first has the normal light enabled for RGB collection. The second has the IR LED enabled for the dust scan. I think the scans will often be misaligned and the software (Vuescan in this case) has to resolve this. Have you tried an older version of Vuescan to see if it solves your problem ? -- Steven
From: Jeff Randall on 17 Jan 2008 12:43 On Jan 16, 7:13 am, Ian Worthington <ianworthing...(a)usa.net> wrote: > I've looked at the results with Vuescan 8.3.75 today and dust removal > (colour negs) sill doesn't work (IR3, heavy removal). Have you tried the latest version of VueScan 8.4.56? I think somewhere along the way Ed fixed or at least improved the FS4000 cleaning function problem. jr
From: Roger S. on 17 Jan 2008 13:37 On Jan 17, 12:43 pm, Jeff Randall <jrand...(a)ch2m.com> wrote: > On Jan 16, 7:13 am, Ian Worthington <ianworthing...(a)usa.net> wrote: > > > I've looked at the results with Vuescan 8.3.75 today and dust removal > > (colour negs) sill doesn't work (IR3, heavy removal). > > Have you tried the latest version of VueScan 8.4.56? I think somewhere > along the way Ed fixed or at least improved the FS4000 cleaning > function problem. As I've happily not been scanning I haven't tried it. Last time I checked 8.4.37? it worked better than it ever has for single images but managed to simply not save with IR correction for batch scans of color negatives. The second pass was done and if you hit the save button you could get a file with IR cleaning applied (sometimes) but it didn't work automatically. I don't know if this was fixed. Please help Ed troubleshoot, other FS4000US users. He did fix a huge focus problem around 8.4.3? that didn't exist at the time of 8.3.75. "Progress" Roger
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Guide for Free internet fax service Next: Free internet fax service around the world |